Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2025

This is an archive for featured picture candidates from April 2025.
The debates are closed and should not be edited.

File:Cheremoszky Preserve RB.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2025 at 19:02:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I would expect more details and more sharpness. The composition is quite good, very good. --XRay 💬 11:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice view, maybe could do with a little more space on the left hand side to complete the curve of the shoreline Cmao20 (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, although the sunlight coming from behind the camera lights up the right side nicely. Tsays22 (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm a little bit bothered by the magenta cast in the photo, it's not much but looking at the clouds it's there. --Cart (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imsouane beach Morocco 6.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 02:03:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I quite like the choice to have a vertical composition here, it's brave and helps highlight the layers in the waves and the rocks. But personally I can't see enough outstanding in terms of motif, light (which is quite harsh) or quality to make this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It lacks wow in my view, and I don't like the composition with tight crop bottom and top. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plain vanilla muffin in Tuntorp.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 11:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Bread
Info Plain vanilla muffin, newly baked and photographed on crumpled baking paper. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, golden brown, fragrant - you can almost smell the vanilla. A feast for the eyes, but sadly not for my taste buds! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're ever in the neighborhood, I'll make you some. :) I'm so very glad you are well enough to participate here again! You've been missed. --Cart (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that sounds amazing! Thank you so much! I'm doing my best - pain is a stubborn companion, but good company (and the thought of vanilla muffins) helps :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Pleasant and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 12:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appetizing and atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This looks delicious, but I don't like the background paper. Yann (talk) 20:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When you bake muffins like this, there is always a risk that one or some of them will tip a bit and spill onto the sheet pan. To prevent the messy burning and the following cleaning, a baking paper is often used to cover the pan. It can be re-used between the batches even if it's wrinkled and slightly burned. I liked the texture of it, so I included it. More interesting than a plain flat surface to me, but that's a matter of taste. --Cart (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support There is like a yellow cast in my view, and I think the light could have been better with limited shadow in the foreground. I also share Yann's view on the paper background. However, the composition is fine and it's an appetizing FPC of food -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Bad background. And what is special for this image?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shagil Kannur, are you sure of your evaluation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, I can't see anything special. The Plain vanilla muffin may be delicious. But what make this image featured? I don't know. If this is my mistake please explain. Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Food photography is a little different since it literally deals with our taste. A simple way of explaining a good food photo, besides good technical quality, is that it makes the food look fresh, tasty, interesting and presented in a way that makes you want to have the food and eat it. --Cart (talk) 09:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Bread

File:D-6-78-181-31 Kerlachkapelle Stadtlauringen.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 12:37:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Motif, sharpness, resolution, colors and light are convincing. --Milseburg (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Milseburg. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Cmao20--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)~~[reply]

Not sure what you meant to say here Shagil Kannur, was this intended to be a vote? Cmao20 (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mobile editing error. Sorry for this time. Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Milseburg. – Aristeas (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Kalkkoora Bhagavathi Theyyam At Kunjimangalam (34).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 17:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala, an Indian State. In this photo documented live performance of a Theyyam.
All by --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, per the rules, could you write a good description in the |description = box on the file page. This is so that people searching for photos can find it easier, and so all of us living outside Kerala can have a better understanding about what the photo depicts. Like who is the dancer supposed to be, are there any specific meanings for the colors and different items on the costume, are the dancers men or female, when and for how long is the dance/celebration. We foreigners would love to hear about such things. ;) Thank you. --Cart (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Shagil Kannur (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you. Striking image and interesting description. Information about an image always makes it more valuable. --Cart (talk) 09:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive pose, striking and colorful composition. Thank you very much for the detailed description. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please Ranjithsiji and Shagil Kannur, you should never rename and move a file during a FPC nomination, unless you know exactly what you are doing. The move broke all the links necessary for the FPC system to work. I have now cleaned up that mess for you and everything is fine, but in the future fix re-naming before or after the nomination, never during. Thank you. --Cart (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Cart. I apologise for the problems caused by me. I used the mass rename script to rename all the files because the main subject of the file was different. It is an intolerable factual error in the case of file name. But I did not noticed this exact FPC. Sorry for the problems. I will be careful in future and thank you for your quick help. Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I’ll be more careful next time. The names were incorrectly given for the 157 photos I uploaded. With Ranjithsiji’s help, all the misnamed files have been corrected, including this one. Once again, I apologize for the mistake.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Please just ask some experienced FPC-user for help or give some warning if you need to move any files here at FPC. We can always make things work, we just need to know so we can keep your nominations safe. --Cart (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Common grackle in PP (36732).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 00:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Icteridae_(Icterids)
Info Common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), a kind of blackbird. I like that this shot captures some of its feathers' iridescence. Fun fact: a group of grackle sis called a "plague". :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful bird and great compo with the helpful twig matching the shapes of the bird. --Cart (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart. – Aristeas (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 09:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Icteridae (Icterids)

File:Indrakeeladri and Prakasam Barrage from Tadepalli (02).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2025 at 13:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info No FPs of this place. Just great light and satisfying composition. created by I.Mahesh – uploaded by I.Mahesh – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's really great that you keep finding photos from new places and new photographers, but in doing so, would you please see to it that the photos are accompanied with good descriptions and categorizations. This nomination is to the 'Boats' gallery without any mention of the boats on the file page. Please remember that (per the rules) documentation is just as important for an FP as the photo. I'm asking you kindly. --Cart (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I.Mahesh for fixing this! :-) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I do generally do this, but yes, sure, you’re right Cmao20 (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice distribution of the various objects in the photo for me. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats

File:Kingfisher with a catch.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 17:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info created & uploaded by Dipu ME-12 – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good moment but not sharp enough IMO. Sorry--Ermell (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry but per Ermell, not really focussed properly and only 6 megapixels, hence not FP for me despite excellent moment and good composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on a second, it says the voting period ends on april 6. I want to support this Henrysz (talk) 03:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Henrysz but you are too late. Please read the rules regarding the 5-days closing at COM:FPC#General rules #8. It's always good to know the rules before you go in to express your opinion on a review page. --Cart (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handcrafted.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Mahinur11 – uploaded by Mahinur11 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak support~~ Editing quality could be better, but it's striking, unusual motif that makes you happy to view. I also like that your nominations have good descriptions and categories, that makes it easier for users who are searching for specific photos to find these. --Cart (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is oversaturated (see the woman's face). I would support with less saturation. Yann (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are right. Any chance of fixing this Kaim Amin? --Cart (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I noticed the oversaturation too. I'll try to upload a fixed image. Kaim (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until it is fixed. Yann (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{ ~~Support~~ {--Ermell (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Somehow. Crop could be better, to put her head on up-left third, or , to remove sand border on both sides - crop or strecth size. --Mile (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC) p.S. Here, i would try this option too. @Kaim Amin[reply]
Weak support Per Cart --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in its current form. Mile's crop is definitely superior, and the saturation as pointed by Yann has also not been fixed. A renaming is also required for a more descriptive title. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Too many issues as such, would support if all fixes are implemented. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting but could be improved, per above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version (Saturation edited, cropped)

Support, As suggested above, I edited it a bit and cropped on either side. pinging Basile Morin, Ermell, JukoFF, MZaplotnik, PetarM, Shagil Kannur, UnpetitproleX, W.carter, Yann -- Kaim (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging again, Basile Morin, Ermell, JukoFF, MZaplotnik -- Kaim (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PetarM, Shagil Kannur, UnpetitproleX, W.carter, Yann -- Kaim (talk) 13:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you, this is better. I've striked my vote above and moved it down here. For some reason I didn't get any 'ping' (I just came to have a look anyway) so let's hope it worked for the rest of the voters. Sometimes group pings to more than 5 users doesn't work here on Commons. If the others don't show up, you might have to make some new 'pings' in smaller groups. --Cart (talk) 23:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. I pinged everyone again, not sure if it worked. Kaim (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well Kaim Amin, the pings definitely didn't work this time. You can't use the same time stamp and just add people to it. A ping only works if you mention the person and sign it with a new time stamp in the same edit. This is a safeguard in the system to not having people pinged as soon as someone else edit a section. I have this page on my watchlist and that's why I saw this. --Cart (talk) 13:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay :) how about now? such a hassle actually. Kaim (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, I didn't get any ping. Hope some of the others got through. And yes it is a hassle but I didn't design the system, I'm only trying to help you make this a successful nomination. --Cart (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter, Nah it's okay. Thank you for helping. Kaim (talk) 13:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good improvement, many thanks for the alternative version. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dont see much improvement. 1st put her face on up-left third, and borders of sand on right side. Crop should be more approproate. --Mile (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral to this version, leaning support, the saturation still looks a bit unnatural to me; Yann's version here (this image) looks less odd imo. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the ping did not work for me either. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:17, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice angle of view, interesting craft work. (Note I did not received the ping above) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the improvements. The person (and all three-dimensionality) gets almost lost in the colourful ornaments of the handmade fans, giving the photo a striking psychedelic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better.(Note I did not received the ping above as well) --Ermell (talk) 06:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 11:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

The chosen alternative is: File:Woman sewing handfans.jpg

File:Masonic Temple in Orland, California-L1001527.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 02:59:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A well balanced composition that highlights the striking blue windows as a focal point. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bland building, but the 'Hopper-ish' composition makes it work. --Cart (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart. Painterly. A study in cream and blue colours. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart & Radomianin. – Terragio67 (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like combo of colors and architecture. I dont like PD edit, too much - making trapezoid out of rectangle and would put smaller Aperture, its not portrait. Anyway.--Mile (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

File:La Palma - Caldera de Taburiente Interior - 4.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unexceptional mountain image, in my view. Harsh shadows, hazy background and dull light. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The landscape is awesome, but perhaps the photo would benefit from a little more light and a square crop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.carter (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --imehling (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thanks! For me this brings out the layers in the scene better and the trees sits more balanced in the composition. --Cart (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Dramatic and satisfying composition for me despite edge sharpness being only OK Cmao20 (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the new version.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive landscape in my eyes – with the distinctive trees on the steep rock and the rising clouds it reminds me of Chinese landscape paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light is representative. The rising clouds in the background make it more interesting.--Milseburg (talk) 11:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 11:17, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands

File:Schönbach Kirche Innenraum 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:39:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Interior with the three winged altars of the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good evocation of a modest but lovely church Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot in poor and difficult lighting conditions. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Terragio67 – the nuanced reproduction of light and shadows reminds me of some masterly Dutch oil paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria

File:De Kerf.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:17:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Beach crossing De Kerf in the Schoorl dunes. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing landscape, but the image is too blurry, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks sharp to me, and don't forget it's 36 megapixels Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Yes, it could use a bit more sharpness and contrast, but it's also extremely beautiful. As lovely as beach dunes are, they are also tricky to work into a good compo, so well done for this. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and mood. In places like these dunes it’s often difficult to find a typical view which condenses the essence of the landscape in a single image; here this has been achieved. – Aristeas (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:46, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Netherlands

File:Rheinsberg Schloss und Park asv2024-03 img04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:42:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info The lake side of the Rheinsberg Palace. All by me --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely reflections and lovely architecture Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per aboveː Beautiful composition, denoising performed to the limit of perfection. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Well done and an outstanding motif, but I think light is a bit too dull here for wowing. --Milseburg (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Neat mirror image of a special building -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Compo and quality are fine, the ligthing boring Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:40, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Reflections

File:Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 05-02-2025. (actm.) 11.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 05:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on an overgrown heathland in mild evening light.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The curved track at the right, the pond at the left and the clouds frame and emphasize the pines and make the composition successful. - Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Pinaceae

File:Gallusovo nabrezje in Ljubljana (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Slovenia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! You somehow have given it the look of an ink drawing with watercolor rendering. --Cart (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is pretty great - unusual but effective composition, excellent light Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. Looking at it reminds me a little of Canaletto's paintings. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Often this kind of twilight etc. doesn’t work well; but it did with this scenery, per Cart etc. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Successful long-exposure shot and interesting buildings -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above... -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:08, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Radomianin Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:38, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Slovenia

File:Folklor Constantini.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 23:04:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)
Info Singers from Constantine (Algeria). Created by Khaled zerfaoui – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the camera movement doesn't add anything to this in my opinion. I could imagine some forms of axial blur used to convey motion, but this is just shaky. JayCubby (talk) 15:48, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
نعم انه اهتزاز لا غير لكن فكرتنا او نظرتنا تختلف صديقي ، عندما يكون الابداع مغلق في ذهنك لا استطيع تبرير لهذا اشكرك على مرورك لكن من احسن والافضل ان تتعمق اكثر في عالم التجريد فهو ليس تحريك كاميرا فقط في معتقدك تحياتي الحارة Khaled zerfaoui (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I don't think ICM works so well in this particular context. It's a fun experiment but not an FP for me. --Cart (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 22:36, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old woman with a Yellow Scarf.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 06:16:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Old woman of Algeria. Created by Fawzi Demmane– nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 06:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 06:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well executed portrait with remarkable expression of the subject. Please, add the Personality rights in Summary section. ... -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:22, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Terragio67 Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support In my opinion, her gaze carries gentleness and lived wisdom, wrapped in quiet melancholy. The fine lines tell of love, loss, and hope. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:48, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice even if the eyes are unfortunately not quite sharp.--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Terragio67 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful portrait --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 11:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice shot but in fact the level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Pre-pupation stage of Freyeria putli (Kollar, 1844) - Black-spotted Grass Jewel (2) WLB.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 09:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice motif but unfortunately oversharpened in post-processing. With so many of good pictures, focus stacking would be the best solution.--Ermell (talk) 20:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid taht Ermell is right, it's too shallow Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roofed section of Fredsgatan in Gothenburg.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 11:24:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info The roofed section with shop signs of Fredsgatan, a prestigious shopping street in Gothenburg, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry for the perspective at first sight. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Perspective is intentional for a dynamic impression. It is corrected based on the opening at the end of the arcade, which is horisontal and straight. Not all architecture photos need to follow the "FP church aisle perspective". --Cart (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I agree with Moheen. It's directly visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's visible when it's intentional. If you don't like it, that's fine, but it's not something that accidentally happened to the photo or something I forgot to fix. The whole idea here is to play with the strong lines in the scene, treating it as something almost abstract. --Cart (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a matter of taste. For me the dynamic impression is successful.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It works also for me. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~I wold clean CA, anoted. Picture is not so bad.~~ --Mile (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed Thanks for the tip! Talk about having a blind spot in your own photo. :) --Cart (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The architectural arrangement and perspective lends a pleasing depth and draws the eye into the distance. In addition, the interplay of light and shadow adds dynamism to the scene and, for me personally, a sense of clarity and structure. The mentioned CA's are not prominently visible, but can be removed (especially on the Junkyard clothing store logo). -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Let's see. Good aperture, quality fine, and something different. One out of "normal". --Mile (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light is well handled but the content with commercial signs is uninteresting in my subjective view, sorry (no wow) and I don't like the angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not quite per Basile: I like the angle of view and the subtle perspective correction, but I'm not a fan of the HDR look (lifted shadows, toned-down highlights, punchy colours). Difficult shot and interesting nomination, nonetheless -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It looks randomed to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Sebastián de La Gomera 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 08:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice and appealing composition but not quite the quality you'd expect from a panorama. The structures and rocks work but the greenery looks very "Minecraft-y". --Cart (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the green looks something like this in January.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, too low-quality. The detail is lost at high magnification. JayCubby (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support weakish because the details at full size are not that good but I love the colours and the panoramic composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Beautiful colours and arrangement, but the light is a bit unfortunate, making the buildings look rather flat and overexposed, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose CA's on trees on the right, and all buildings lack details. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Екатерина Борисова, unfortunately not enough details in my view. Sorry. --imehling (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Compo is fine, lighting also ok to me but the detail is far too low with no mitigating conditions here. Poco a poco (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:07, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panteón, París, Francia, 2022-10-29, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 21:13:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#France
Info Ceiling of the Panthéon, Paris, France. The edifice was built between 1758 and 1790, from designs by Jacques-Germain Soufflot, at the behest of King Louis XV of France. Some of the most important personalities in France's history are buried in its necropolis, among them, Voltaire, Rousseau, Victor Hugo or Louis Braille. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing, exemplary symmetry. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:47, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Difficult light quite well handled here -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#France

File:Carl Nebel - Genl. Scott's entrance into Mexico, Plate 45.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 01:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Adolphe Jean-Baptiste Bayot after Carl Nebel, restored, uploaded, ans nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view of the Zócalo with the Cathedral. – Aristeas (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1899

File:Bharathanatyam by Dr. Janaki Rangarajan (51).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 09:14:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Bharatanatyam is a classical Indian dance form originating from Tamil Nadu, with a history spanning over 2,000 years. In this photo live performance by Dr. Janaki Rangarajan, a celebrated Bharatanatyam dancer. All by-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great pose, good capture and thank you for the very interesting description. --Cart (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Sorry to the the party crasher here but I find the image overprocessed. The face looks like plastic to me. Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! I don't know what you mean by party crasher here. Anyway you can also watch the unprocessed version at the file page. It was a live event. Mixed light sources were there. Shagil Kannur (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think how the face looks is partly due to light, and partly to makeup. Yann (talk) 10:06, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you maybe right, Yann, I move to Neutral Poco a poco (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Galappel (Cynips quercusfolii) 25-12-2024. (d.j.b).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 05:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info oak-apple still attached to an oak leaf, sunk in a carpet of leaves under tall trees. Focus stack of 33 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Famberhorst: , please, check the contour of the little water layer below the fungus. There is a cloning effect on its right-hand side end. --Harlock81 (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Harlock81: If I understand the place correctly, the error has been corrected. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was there.

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cart (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting photo subject. Thanks for the retouching! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another good focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality is decent for a small fruit but it is nothing extraordinary to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear *:@User:Poco a poco You call the subject of my photo ordinary small fruit. But there is no fruit in the photo at all. The photo shows a gall. A gall is a proliferation of a plant, caused by a parasite or symbiont, usually an insect (a gall wasp, gall midge, common fig wasp, fly, aphid or gall mite). How seriously should I take your assessment if you don't even bother to read the description of the photo?--Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Others

File:Tufted titmouse (84917).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 14:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae_(Tits)
Info Tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 10:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exemplary, lovely capture in good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cuteness overload. --Cart (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light and background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 06:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful composition and great detail on this adorable bird specimen. Here, here, here! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae_(Tits)

File:Little tern (Sternula albifrons) male, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Laridae (Gulls, terns and skimmers)
Info created by Princepauljoy – uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a bit noisy but still a spectacular capture Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, too noisy and oversharpened for my taste. The scene itself though is fantastic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Imho, the bokeh doesn't look entirely natural. Nevertheless, the scenery is magnificent, a fortunate moment to have captured in a photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your valuable opinion.The picture was captured from padma rivrbad.Due to noise decreases,adding a bit cool tone and detail decreases it is looking like a bit more bokeh then the raw one. Princepauljoy (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your kind and detailed explanation about the bokeh! I truly admire your dedication and the passion you put into your photography. Personally, I feel the image is slightly overprocessed, so I won't cast a support vote - but that doesn't change my appreciation for your beautiful work. Wishing you all the best, and please keep sharing your wonderful photos :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I see the problems but still think the scene is special enough to call this one of our best --Kritzolina (talk) 07:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Spectacular scene, but the editing quality is simply too low for me. --Cart (talk) 10:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree about the quality but this is the most extraordinary shot among the current FPCs. Poco a poco (talk) 17:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Laridae (Gulls, terns and skimmers)

File:Teatro Victoria, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-16, DD 74-76 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 22:15:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info Night view of the Victoria Theatre, Singapore. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and great quality Cmao20 (talk) 11:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good memories. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--BigDom (talk) 07:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore

File:Lac de Serre-Ponçon DSC00730.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 06:43:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Alpes
Info Lake of Serre-Ponçon viewed from Rousset (Hautes-Alpes, France) created by Pline -- Pline (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pline (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition! Cmao20 (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 08:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Alpes

File:Yellow-footed Green Pigeon হলদে-পা হরিয়াল.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 10:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
Info created & uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FP Gallery can be specify with Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves). ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry but in my opinion oversharpened which I struggle to overlook at this relatively low resolution Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support though quality can be better I still like the subject. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. Nice bird and compo but unfortunately the editing quality sinks it. --Cart (talk) 10:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:View of First Vermillion Lake and Mount Bourgeau 20240821 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 11:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Alberta
Info Banff National Park is always a beautiful place for landscape photos. There are no FPs from this specific place so far. created by DXR – uploaded by DXR – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric, the sky and its reflection turn a beautiful landscape into an extraordinarily beautiful one. In my opinion, the slight image noise is tolerable. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:46, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 08:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#Alberta

File:La Zisa (Palermo)-msu-1093.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2025 at 04:07:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Italy
Info Zisa palace in Palermo, Italy. created by Matthias Süßen – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose FP potential like a lot of Matthias's photos but very obviously tilted unfortunately Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment...and facade in shadow. Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 20:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 45a.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 13:13:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Veneto
Info Punta Penia, the highest peak of the Dolomites. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light and certainly an angle of this peak we don't see very often, but it needs to be renamed, preferably after the nomination is over, to better describe what's in the photo. --Cart (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing view Cmao20 (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:22, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart. BigDom (talk) 06:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 08:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Veneto

File:Traditional Kinnauri house, Sangla, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 19:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice architecture but the harsh midday light doesn't help to distinguish the roof and the ground floor -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review, I've tried to soften the light and reduce the shadows a little. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts, but the snow is now grey. Sorry I find the previous version, with more vivid colors, better -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Performed another edit, tried to bring back brilliance in the snow without replicating the overexposed look of original. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I know what Basile Morin means, the house is a little bit dark under the harsh light and blends into the background. Nevertheless I love it. Great choice to go for a square composition to focus on the house. It's a really interesting subject and I love how the angular and jagged roof looks like one of the mountain peaks. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --Kritzolina (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support by others--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Too much house and too little mountains here but overall acceptable to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:27, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India

File:Portrait of a Daguerreotypist, 1845 (with Frame).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 15:06:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1800-1849
Info created by unknown photographer, restored and uploaded by Wcamp9 and Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
Support There was some issue in the previous version, now fixed. -- Yann (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like he could be one of Dexter's ancestors. ;) Interesting photo (I like seeing the little special boxes for the photos that you needed back then) and good restauration. --Cart (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but you really needn't credit me for helping put back a couple bits mistakenly edited out. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- To quickly clarify: Wcamp9 accidentally restored away a pin on his vest and a knob on a drawer. That is trivial to fix using layers and some very minor adjustments to match colours, but it's not obvious how if you don't know how to use layers. I know how, so offered to do it, and did. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:45, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC))[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1800-1849

File:Рождественское утро на Белой горе.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 23:36:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
Info Christmas morning view of church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Belogorsky Monastery, Perm Krai, Russia. Created & uploaded by Ted.ns – nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite nice mood but a bit large composition with too much snow maybe, and it needs perspective correction -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's angle view, because the cathedral (and the whole monastery, which is very small) stands on the top of the big hill (the place name, Belaya Gora, means White Mountain). -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good composition and nice mood, but Basile Morin is right. Would support with perspective correction and maybe a little bit of a bottom crop. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above and for now. I'm afraid that in the resulting image the cross would be to far to the right border and it's a shame that the crop is so generous the level of detail of the church will be just ok Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have uploaded an edited version (here) with perspective corrected and a panoramic 2:1 crop, which I believe works best. You can nominate that as an alternative, @Екатерина Борисова: if you wish. :) UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for your work. I need to consult with the author, it is difficult for me to decide without his participation. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the composition has become worse and more boring, but if such cropping is needed for some purpose, then I don’t mind adjusting my photo. Ted.ns (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ted.ns: the cropping is optional; the perspective correction, though, I believe is essential for FP. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UnpetitproleX, now we have an answer from the author. To be honest, I don't know how to nominate alternative version, but if you want to nominate your version yourself feel free to do it. But please don't overwrite the original photo, because it is used a lot, including it's among the best photos in the Russian part of WLM contest. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:47, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac d'Espingo (6).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scenic and loads of details to explore at sharp full resolution Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose IMHO the shadow is spoiling the compo, unfortunately if cropped out the bottom crop to the lake would be too tight Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps crop of a narrow strip with the halved rock at the bottom improves the composition. --imehling (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 08:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Occitanie

File:D-4-71-165-12 Sandhof (Oberhaid), Franz-Xaver-Kapelle, Ringmauer, Schuppen.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 05:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 05:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this is a beautiful picture but I don't know if the white balance is a little too warm? Cmao20 (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure but I made it slightly cooler. Plozessor (talk) 15:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but it isn't talking to me. The building is ok, the wall in shadow and obscuring part of the building. I cannot for sure but there may be a better POV and time to shot it. Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The right crop makes the image look a little 'unfinished' with the part of the wall going down towards the edge. I would support an 'Alternative' version where the crop ends at the peak of that wall/building, I think that would frame the church better. You should never underestimate where a strong line meets the border of a photo. I will leave a note on the image, take a look and see what you think. --Cart (talk) 12:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajuntament de Tiana.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 08:41:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info created by Friviere – uploaded by Friviere – nominated by Friviere -- Paco ✉ 08:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paco ✉ 08:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Welcome to FPC and thank you for your nomination. An interesting building that you present to us, but I'm afraid it doesn't have much chance of passing the high hurdles of this forum. The perspective distortion can be fixed, but the weak lighting could be a problem, in my opinion. I recommend that you first nominate it on QIC (Quality images) or, if it is a particularly unique image, on VIC (Valued images). I also recommend the image guidelines on this page. Thank you very much, we look forward to seeing more of your images. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hegaulandschaft.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 13:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info Beautiful panorama with lots of annotations to identify the mountains in the photo. created by Suedkollektiv – uploaded by Suedkollektiv – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good find, worthy candidate. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 16:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 19:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:43, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Somewhat underexposed IMO but a lovely scene and large resolution. BigDom (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg

File:Bill Thompson (Tasmanian convict) grey.jpg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 01:28:22

Info First of all, it's a black and white mangling of a sepia original, second, the sepia version says it's cropped from the original, and I don't know if it could be cropped better - the failure to get it at the time has meant link rot has lost us the chance - but it's a pretty bad crop. Absolutely no foot room. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I'm not sure about the customs of the 2006 vote. It seemed to be only a question of which of the pictures would be FP, not whether any would be. I also think there isn't one. Possibly VI. --Milseburg (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The standard for FP is way higher now. --Yann (talk) 14:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The customs were different in 2006, but the original nomination is still a bad joke. Five people voted on the sepia version (4 pro, 1 contra). Then somebody (not the original nominator) jumped in and added the b&w version, saying they would support that one. No one of the previous voters commented on the b&w version. Then the votes were counted in a completely arbitrary manner, claiming that 5 voters supported the b&w version – well, we only know that a single voter supported it, the one who had added it … Even if this was the greatest photo ever, we cannot say that it has been promoted correctly. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that looked odd, didn't realise it was THAT odd. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I don't think this picture was ever validly promoted in the first place so it's almost a procedural delist really Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist Thanks to Aristeas for unravelling this case. --Cart (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Thi (talk) 20:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per technical shortcomings and other issues of the original nomination vote from 2006 –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. BigDom (talk) 06:13, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 9 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral → delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weichersbach.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Looking from Schwarzenberg castle northward to Weichersbach in the valley of the Schmale Sinn. At the bottom left is the south portal of the Landrücken Tunnel and an ICE train.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
Info Instructive and typical view of a German landscape in the middle mountain range in spring: View from, Schwarzenfels Castle into the valley of the Schmale Sinn. At the bottom left is the south portal of the Landrücken Tunnel and an ICE train. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge resolution and detail, nice composition. Light is only okay but other factors outweigh that. Cmao20 (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, light is quite normal, but I think for the most WP-projects this is better than quite extraordinary light situation showing the scene in a nor representative way. Milseburg (talk) 12:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Cmao20, the light is not appealing and otherwise the landscape is nice but not extraordinary, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 17:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A very useful image, no doubt, but such ordinary light diminishes the 'wow' factor. BigDom (talk) 06:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Germany

File:Le statue dei Re Magi su una barca storica nel Canale Leonardesco, Cesenatico, Italia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 07:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info The “'Paranza'“ boat displays the wooden statues of the Three Wise Men, part of the floating Nativity scene which boasts the recognition: “Heritage of Italy for tradition”, awarded by the italian Ministry of Tourism for “Its ability to keep alive the folklore and traditions of the territory...“. All by Terragio67. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ It's a pity the reflection is cut, with the whole mast there and less sky it would have been a spectacular photo. But I won't stand in the way if other people think this is adequate. --Cart (talk) 10:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, Yeah you're right, thanks, but this photo is still cute, so I preferred to add a valid alternative that could overcome your objections, even if partial. Thanks for your constructive criticism, as always. Terragio67 (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Now this new crop is much better and I can support it. --Cart (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~ Per Cart. Nice colors and fine light, but the cropped reflection spoils the composition. --Milseburg (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It might be beneficial to crop 1100–1200 pixels from the bottom (and the same amount of empty sky). This would minimize the already incomplete reflection. --Milseburg (talk) 13:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. Editing this photo is not possible, because the reflections of the subject collide with another boat next to me. I thought it would be better to upload a new alternative image from a different angle. Terragio67 (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really Sorry, I misunderstood your suggestion because I read it hastily. I liked the result proposed updating the image, thanks. Terragio67 (talk) 04:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful motif and colours for me, in spite of cut reflection Cmao20 (talk) 12:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Good light but cut out reflection. Note I prefer this angle of view than the alternative below -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this solution now. The angle is better than the alternative below and the other one looks a bit too long at the lower part. --Milseburg (talk) 13:27, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better this one Poco a poco (talk) 17:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support From a visual point of view, I found the square version more appealing right from the start. In my opinion, the reflection on the water surface is of secondary importance. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support this version --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per UnpetitproleX. --Famberhorst (talk) 05:16, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the new version --imehling (talk) 11:38, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative new version

Info I decided to upload a new version according to the criticism above. It was photographed from a different angle where the boat reflections did not collide with other boats... Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for showing this, but I think the angle and light is better in the first one. In this the reflection is too prominent. --Cart (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this one because the reflection is not cut off. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The other one is much better but this one is still okay for FP Cmao20 (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --imehling (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I prefer the other version with the new crop. Perhaps some voters should be 'pinged' about this change. --Cart (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree Poco a poco (talk) 17:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose in favor of the square version above. Sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Berthold Werner @MZaplotnik @Yann @Llez @Famberhorst @imehling @Agnes Monkelbaan By the way thanks for your support, I wanted to let you know that I made a change to the first image on Milseburg's advice. It seems incredible how a seemingly insignificant change (crop) has changed the first proposal for the better. If you can, please, verify the difference by confirming or (if you prefer) changing your vote. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Prefer original -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats

The chosen alternative is: File:Le statue dei Re Magi su una barca storica nel Canale Leonardesco, Cesenatico, Italia.jpg

Daphnis hypothous hypothous, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2025 at 16:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Female dorsal
Female ventral
Male dorsal
Male ventral

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
Info Daphnis hypothous hypothous mounted specimen male and female created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus – nominated by Olivier LPB -- Olivier LPB (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olivier LPB (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question This might be an ignorant and stupid question, but with all the beautiful photos we now have of living Lepidoptera, are we still promoting mounted specimens? --Cart (talk) 18:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support We must always ask ourselves what purpose the photos were taken for. Yes, we have beautiful photos of living butterflies, but photos of prepared specimens are just as important. From a taxonomic point of view, it is important to identify all the relevant characteristics of a species. This is often not possible with photos of living animals, which only show one side of the body and only either the upper or underside of the wing. Sometimes not even one side of the wing is completely visible because the wings are folded. There are even species that can only be identified by looking at the internal genitalia. In these cases, live specimens cannot be correctly identified at all. So, with photos, I have to choose between aesthetic and scientific value. These are excellent scientific photos and this is the reason, why museums mount butterflies in this way. --Llez (talk) 04:47, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem with the scientific value of these mounted specimens and I agree with you on that. But I seem to recall some past discussions about that we shouldn't, through promoting new FPs of mounted specimens, encourage people to kill and collect animals in this way any more. Catching and colleting butterflies was a widely spread hobby when I was young, but with the dwindling population of so many species, scientist are more and more talking about protecting butterflies and moths. Some species are even illegal to harm or kill. And with all the good cameras we have these days, even education is moving from using specimen images and drawings to photos of individuals that are alive. This concern was the basis of my question, not the aesthetics of the image. --Cart (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Juste for this specific case "le mal est fait", in fact, the museum of Toulouse has herit of a big collection of butterflies of fr:Laurent Schwartz died in 2002, and thanks to Archaeodontosaurus, this collection is taken in photo for commons. There is no actualy for this project some killing of butterfly. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know that these particular images are "safe", but they will still inspire others when we promote them. We all know that the Internet is far from safe. Since voters here often sneer at zoo photos, photos of glued frogs, freezing insects, kingfisher setups or captivity shots even if licensed, I'm just wondering where we draw the lines today. --Cart (talk) 15:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:54, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not only scientific, but also high educational value. High quality. Yann (talk) 11:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 11:45, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: Je te remercie. That's an excellent question! In vivo images are very beautiful, but they are not normative. For science, there are reference positions for different species (including Homo sapiens). For Homo sapiens, it is not necessary to insert a needle, but for insects, it is the norm for specimens. "In vivo" and "specimens" are not in competition; they are complementary. Descriptions of species and subspecies are often made on millimetric details. To answer your second question, you're not mistaken; what you say is correct. If you look at the specimens, you'll see that they're old, often very old. They're museum specimens, and they're recorded as such with references. It's up to museums to fulfill this role. You should also know that the specimens on display deteriorate over time, and we also have to replace them. As you can see, it's a bit complicated.

If you ever attend a specimen photography session in a museum, you'll be surprised by the methodology. Everything must be prepared with the greatest care, and opening a box is a great responsibility, especially if it's a collection of our prestigious elders. The Holy Grail is the red label with the word TYPE on it! It's the reference butterfly for the species. There, no mistakes are allowed. This is how, at the back of the museum, in a dark room, we can experience great emotion.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand that this is scientific and legal and made with great care at the museum, but the internet is full of idiots who will carelessly copy every behavior they think they can do better. Perhaps these photos of old museum collections should have a template stating that, and caution others to not trap and kill Lepidoptera unless they are supervised by a scientific institution. Might not do much good, but at least we can try to conserve the species we still have left. --Cart (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: ::You have excellent convictions that I fully share. But you said a very true word: they are idiots! They don't care about warning banners at all. I'm old and I've had time to think. I try to show them beautiful images of Nature and make them love it. I believe more in love than in coercion.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 14:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)

File:Mangoes for sale in Kerala (2).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 08:31:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Ripe Mangoes. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, but in texture/pile photos like this, the small details matter. In this I'm distracted by the scrap of paper at the bottom and the empty corner up right. The light is also a bit dull and doesn't give the fruit the wow-factor for me. --Cart (talk) 09:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Cart, I immediately saw the scrap of paper and the empty corner, and that means it doesn't match some of the fruit pile photos we already have in the gallery for quality. I also think the perspective has distorted some of the mangoes towards the edge of the frame and this damages the impression of regularity that is useful in pictures like this. Cmao20 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination--Shagil Kannur (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golden-Crowned Kinglet EBFNWR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 03:02:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Regulidae (Kinglets)
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:56, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and well composed - nice find Cmao20 (talk) 11:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes! -- Radomianin (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Constantly moving birds that are very difficult to compose well (tried many times with mixed results) -- you get them in a position for decent bokeh and they're gone by the time you hit the shutter. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:38, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I always joke that Kinglets learned that the beeping sound they just heard was focus lock and they need to move immediately. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 06:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:29, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olivier LPB (talk) 16:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Regulidae (Kinglets)

File:Adams Synchronological Chart, 1881.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 21:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity – wide
Info created by Sebastian C. Adams, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Not scientifically accurate, but still very original. -- Yann (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huuuge size. It took me a while to open this 200 Mo file, but it's worth it. Impressive amount of data. Fiction mixed with reality. Diogenes the cynic "and his tub", "Noah's deluge"... Very good image quality. (Display this in a big way in a waiting room, and patients will stop being bored :-)) Among the many oddities of this document, there is at the end a huge list of "eminent men", but are there women too? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity – wide

File:Path through orchards, Kamru, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2025 at 13:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose My instinct is that although this picture is pleasant, it isn’t a sufficiently outstanding or unusual composition or motif to be FP, and there is no outstandingly high resolution or pixel level detail to mitigate this. Sorry :-( Cmao20 (talk) 21:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. I nominated it because I liked the pleasant mood, the portal-like feeling of the pathway, and the monochromatic appearance. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that something has an almost monochromatic mood, it's sometimes worth a try to edit it in black & white. Just keep in mind that B&W requires a bit different editing than color. You are welcome to use my attempt as an 'Alternative' if you like. --Cart (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of a Cardinal, by Raffael, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 10:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by en:Raphael – uploaded by Dcoetzee – nominated by Mahan -- Mahan (talk) 10:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I found this image in the Persian WP project, nominated by user:Behnam mancini. I'm having a little trouble selecting a gallery, so I left it blank, sorry. -- Mahan (talk) 10:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery fixed. It's a portrait painting of man, so it's pretty straight forward. --Cart (talk) 10:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Thank you for fixing it. Mahan (talk) 11:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support High resolution reproduction of Raffaello's artwork. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info For any voter having trouble with opening this huge file, use this link. It will give you the painting in a more 'normal' size (4000px wide), but still large enough to see all the brushstrokes and details. Sometimes these large files get less attention because they are so hard to open, so this is a way to mitigate that. --Cart (talk) 00:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 00:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Paintings

File:Dark rain clouds departing over Brofjorden.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 12:10:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
Info Dark rain clouds departing over Brofjorden as seen from the shore between Govik and Lahälla, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and brilliant weather for a photo, though perhaps not brilliant weather to be outside for long Cmao20 (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, the storm hit just to the north of this place, but it was very cool to watch from a safe distance. --Cart (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dramatic clouds, powerful play of light - an impressive picture with atmospheric depth. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bad weather also sometimes looks interesting. --imehling (talk) 15:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great atmosphere. BigDom (talk) 06:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support by others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dramatic image with great contrast and fabulous light. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Sweden

File:05 Laal Kach Festival In Bangladesh Kazi Salahuddin Razu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 11:17:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Salahuddinrazu – uploaded by Salahuddinrazu – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaim (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request Please add the {{PR}} template in all your uploads featuring people -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin, Done. Thanks but a comment on this FPC would have been nice too. Kaim (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in its own time :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's a fun image, a great subject and good file decription, but with almost minimalistic composition like this you need to be careful about the details. I find the crop a bit too tight, the light glistening on the body paint is not ideal and that string for the garland around his neck should have been tucked in or removed since it distracts from the main subject. --Cart (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking red painting and red paper guirlands. Shallow DoF but the eyes are in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support DoF could be better but the subject is great.--imehling (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Henrysz (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 08:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Receding Fog over Lake Altaussee.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 18:02:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Styria
Info created by Bernd Thaller – uploaded and nominated by me Юрий Д.К 18:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:02, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like something from a fantasy world Cmao20 (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A clear wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Real sceneries looking surreal are often interesting --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:45, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spectacular! –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Styria

File:Mosquée du Shah, Téhéran, mosaïques (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 17:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info created, uploaded and nominated by User:ZarlokX -- ZarlokX (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ZarlokX (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think it's quite impressive and interesting but I can see a lot of purple and blue chromatic aberration. And seeing there is so much blue in the picture anyway, it might be a difficult fix. Cmao20 (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Innovative composition but motion blur and CA. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good initiative, but per Basile. --Cart (talk) 11:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le chamelier.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 23:13:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Transport workers
Info Camel driver from Algeria. Created by Fawzi Demmane – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The simplicity of the composition is great and that gaze is perfect, but I do miss a bit more of the man, his face scarf is cut a rather abruptly. --Cart (talk) 11:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart except this is a support for me Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just fine --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cart. – Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Ñu común (Connochaetes taurinus), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-23, DD 16.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2025 at 06:16:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info Blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent image quality, clear background Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:02, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Olivier LPB (talk) 16:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Boats on the Ros river near Khreshchatyk.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2025 at 20:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info Before thunderstorm on the Ros river near village of Khreshchatyk, Ukraine. --Rbrechko (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely light and appealing composition Cmao20 (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20 --Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 06:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:00, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats

File:Teide - Pico Viejo 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 15:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- imehling (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A piece of planet Mars on Earth. -- User:ZarlokX (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per ZarlokX.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:47, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 19:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands

File:Partial solar eclipse with some clouds in Tuntorp 43.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 14:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Eclipse
Info We already have some great 'scientific' FPs of eclipses, total and partial (1 and 2), so I'm going to risk a more artistic photo of one.
Partial solar eclipse with some clouds on 29 March 2025, in Tuntorp, Brastad, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. I had my mind set on a sort of sequence, but big clouds moving swiftly with the wind prevented that. I had do make do with photos taken when the clouds were favorable. This is taken with only a normal polarizing filter; I used the clouds as filters for the strong sunlight. Towards the end of the eclipse, like here, the clouds moved in layers so I could get one cloud to cover the sun and another one at lower altitude to make a nice framing. And in a few photos this also made some faint crepuscular rays; this is one of them. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support cool shot, gives a much better sense of what it's like actually to see an eclipse than current FPs Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:07, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is not valuable, both in the sense that it doesn't have 'educational value,' and that there are very many similar photos on commons already. Also the quality is poor. But I commend you for taking a risk --Henrysz (talk) 02:57, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Really, no educational value? I asked ChatGPT for a list of possible uses that meet Wiki Commons' scope, all of them seem pretty reasonable to me: Astronomy Education (Phases of a Solar Eclipse, Sun-Moon-Earth Geometry, Eclipse Observation Conditions), Photography & Optics (Photographing Celestial Events, Light Diffraction and Scattering), Environmental Science (Impact of Eclipses on Atmosphere and Light), Cultural and Historical Context (Modern Eclipse Documentation, Public Engagement in Science), Science Communication (Visual Aid in Presentations or Articles, Comparative Study Tool). Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. forget about educational value. The more important thing is, this image is not unique on commons:

File:Partial Solar Eclipse - 2021-06-10 (51237735156).jpg

File:Mexico Eclipse - 2024 (53646939778).jpg

File:H9A7810 (53641209905).jpg

File:Zatmění Slunce 2022-10-25, Praha (02).jpg

File:Solar Eclipse IMG 4853 (51238870721).jpg

File:Partielle Sonnenfinsternis 29.03.2025 (54416580257).jpg

File:Total Solar Eclipse in Belleville 2024-037-01.jpg

File:Eclipse before Totality (53642220972).jpg

File:PartialSolarEclipseWinnipegMB2024.jpg

File:Сонячне затемнення 25 жовтня 2022 року м. Полтава. Україна 12 год 48 хв 04 сек.jpg

File:Sonnenfinsternis.25.10.2022.Berlin.P1151025.jpg

File:Eclipse de Sol (36720105336).jpg

File:L'éclipse du 21 août 2017 (36580671791).jpg

Why should this be featured and not any of the others? Is it meaningfully superior in some way I'm not seeing?

Henrysz (talk) 02:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, fair point, I have no qualms with that part of the argument. -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I had to turn your example gallery into a list. You can't display other images on a nom since the FPCBot will read them as 'Alternatives' made by the nominator. And to answer your question: I think that this photo has a more aesthetically pleasing composition with the position of the second cloud, the little starbursts and the faint crepuscular rays, than the photos you mention as well as many other on this site. That's why I dared nominate it. --Cart (talk) 09:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:45, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 07:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Eclipse

File:Northwest Crown Fire Experiment.png (delist), not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 22:45:06

nomination page

Info Not that this is a bad image, but there's now a JPG version, and JPG photos are superior to PNGs. JPG: (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Anohthterwikipedian (talk) 22:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 07:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 08:51, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 'JPG photos are superior to PNGs' is a bold assertion and I don't think it's always true. JPG is normally the more natural format for photographs but we have plenty of PNG photographs that are FP, for example this. In this case the JPG is only 475 KB and has clear, if subtle, compression artefacts visible at full size, particularly in the darker areas of the photo. The replacement is thus clearly worse than the original. If you want to make a JPG version of the PNG you can do so without reducing the file size by nearly 90% and losing information. Cmao20 (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep according to Cmao20's convincing evaluation. Addendum: …and according to my statement below. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmao20 and Radomianin: I remade the JPEG version with much less compression. I think no information is really loss now. Yann (talk) 10:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Yann. This is much better and means that this nomination is no longer destructive to the potential of this image. I don't think FPC should waste time replacing existing png images with jpeg alternatives, though - there would be dozens to get through and it'd be a big waste of effort - so I'll keep my vote. Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Yann for the improved Jpg file! However, I feel compelled to add my perspective on Delist and replace nominations. Based on my modest experience, the maintenance work that follows a successful nomination is one of the most labor-intensive tasks, requiring about ~~ten~~ fifteen separate steps. Among other things, this includes creating a redirect page to ensure the correct functionality of the four-pointed star of the former FP ({{Assessments|featured=2}}). Unfortunately, the com-nom parameter reaches its limits here, as it redirects to the wrong page. For this reason, Delist and replace nominations should be chosen with great care - only when absolutely necessary. The first time I did this kind of maintenance, it took me a full hour. Given the minimal difference between the two versions of this nomination, I do not believe the effort is justified. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, this is totally true. And to add to what Radomianin wrote, these delists can per the rules only be closed using the 5-days rule if no one agrees with the nominator. This means that in some cases the nom has to be kept open manually while the FPCBot is trying to close it based on counting the votes like in a normal nomination. When the 'Delists' were first added as a feature in the FPC, it was as a separate system. Later the 'Delists' were incorporated with the normal FPC nomination. However, the voting system here maintained by the FPCBot is not sophisticated enough to deal with delists, let alone delist & replaces, and it fell on the the users who frequent the FPC to handle this manually. This was not a problem then since most voters also did maintenance. But in recent years the numbers of maintainers has dropped drastically. People love to nominate and vote, but not so much taking care of all the "boring" work that follows. So please do not create delists for minor things, leave that to the things that really matters since they are a P.I.T.A. Or even better: Learn how to take care of this kind of nominations and help out. --Cart (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with you, and I also appreciate the historical background you provided on Delist and replace nominations. The lack of active maintainers is indeed a challenge, and I too wish we had more people handling the background work. Just thinking about the galleries - without your and Aristeas' help, they probably wouldn't be as organized as they are now. But that's just my personal opinion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The difference in quality is barely noticeable, and I whole-heartedly support Cmao20's comment about not wasting FPC's energy with such minor replacements. For me, the 'Other versions' placed on the file is enough. --Cart (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The reason JPG is better than PNG is subjective and not sufficient for deselection. --XRay 💬 07:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for two reasons. 1) The general claim that “JPG photos are superior to PNGs” is nonsense. JPEG images are more practical for many reasons, but they are not superior; on the contrary, for archival purposes PNG images are superior because they provide a lossless compression. 2) If we accept this as a reason to delist-and-replace FPs, we may get many more pointless or even questionable delist-and-replace nominations; nobody would profit from the additional amount of work needed to process these nominations. – Aristeas (talk) 08:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral → not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tinnen maatbekers 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 04:39:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
Info Three pewter measuring cups.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition. The creases in the cloth behind it and the dust on the table are a little distracting. The dust could be stamped away. --XRay 💬 07:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note. @User:XRay Thanks for your vote. You want me to stamp the dust away, but I don't understand your statement (The dust could be stamped away.) Do you mean, that I try to clone those spots?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right. --XRay 💬 16:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done, spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per XRay, so I would appreciate a less dusty table. --Cart (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support An impressive and effective composition, full of simple but powerful aesthetics. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a monument. --imehling (talk) 07:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:00, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and imehling. – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 04:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects

File:Pez anémona ensillado (Amphiprion polymnus) en una anémona alfombra de Mertens (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 108.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 08:08:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Saddleback clownfish (Amphiprion polymnus) in a Mertens' carpet sea anemone (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of this species of clownfish. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What a capture! The colours seem quite muted though: have I watched Finding Nemo too many times, and this specific species is not bright orange? -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, clownfishes' color turns darker as they age. Nemo is obviously very young. ;-) But if you follow the category link for this kind of clownfish, you'll see that they are of a darker variety. --Cart (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An this species is indeed darker than others as you can see here. Poco a poco (talk) 20:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Understood, thank you both! -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:14, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great sharpness on the clownfish and super high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 12:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool shot. Great detail and so many pixels on target too! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vulcan loves the detail! –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20 and Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:59, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others, and also a nice composition. – Aristeas (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 04:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)

File:Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 12:08:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#North Macedonia
Info No FPs of this place. Thought it was a great composition. created by Kallerna – uploaded by Kallerna – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bewildered support Maybe I'm just so bored after looking at thousands of perfect pretty towers/monuments/tall things/whatever, that I find it refreshingly interesting to see an excellent quality photo of one during construction. It helps that the crane and scaffolding echo the antenna nearby. --Cart (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is good that the crane is behind the tower. Yann (talk) 22:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:58, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:53, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really well done. Looks a bit futuristic --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann and Panthera --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good composition. – Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 18:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Msb (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 04:44, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#North Macedonia

A kestrel prepares to swoop down on its next meal.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 08:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)
Info created by Andy Morffew – uploaded and nominated by Юрий Д.К 08:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 08:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great capture. I'm not that interested in looking for FPs on Flickr but for anyone who is, a lot of this photographer's work seems quite excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 12:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 04:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:09, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)

File:Gurudongmar Lake Sikkim, India (edit).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 19:54:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info created and uploaded by Yoghya, nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lake is located on a tiny slice of the Tibetan plateau in northern Sikkim (India). Edited by me to remove several dust spots and the CAs present in the original. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition with sharp details, deep, but not oversaturated colors and a wonderful reflection of the subject in the foreground. Definitely has that wow factor, as well as a brrrrrrrr factor. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crisp and cold-looking. --Cart (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 19:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#India

File:-Portrait of unknown man- (48753728902)-restored.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 20:18:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created bye Payne, David John, – uploaded by Tm – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 20:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 20:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this is an outstanding artwork and it isn't of a notable historical figure. I think there has to be a line drawn otherwise we might as well just automatically promote every high-quality digitisation of a painting regardless of the qualities of the painting. Cmao20 (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A rather dull image of average artistic quality, a bit small file compared to other FP artwork, and the photo quality is such that I can't say if the bright patch on the left side is the artist's choice or just a light reflection. --Cart (talk) 08:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euphorbia griffithii (wolfsmelk) 22-03-2025 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 04:46:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Euphorbiaceae
Info Ground shoot of one Euphorbia griffithii Beautifully colored ground shoot emerges in a natural border. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and colours Cmao20 (talk) 11:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 09:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Euphorbiaceae

File:Roger Fenton by the Photographic Society Club, 1856.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2025 at 01:22:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
Info created by Hugh Welch Diamond – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support We can't be too fussy about sharpness for a 1856 picture. Yann (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 04:50, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine, balanced composition. – Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1850-1859

File:Pine Cone and Eucalyptus Leaves, 1932.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2025 at 10:43:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Plants
Info created by Ansel Adams, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Impressive image by a famous photographer. -- Yann (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a very average photo in normal light of a cone from an unidentified pine. Adams' landscape photos are great and of high historic value, but even great photographers take not so notable photos. I have no problem supporting the works he is famous for, but this was not his forte, and since there are no other mitigating things (the cone being from some rare pine, owned by some notable person, etc.) I don't see this as an FP. --Cart (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know what Cart means but it's kinda nice, I think there's something creative in it - the fact that it's black and white focusses the eye on the concentric patterns of the pine cone, not the colours, and helps us see it as a beautiful geometric object. I would probably vote for this if it were a new photo presented in 2025, the fact that it's by a famous photographer is not so important. Cmao20 (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not extremely impressed by this one. The detail feels far flatter than Ansel Adam's usual photos, even his close-ups. It's a really interesting shot, but just doesn't do it for me. JayCubby (talk) 19:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 19:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition – although this is a very narrow detail, in my eyes everything looks like carefully arranged by nature. – Aristeas (talk) 08:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral because I'm unable to make a decision; while I agree with Cart, I also like the composition because it reminds me of the famous Boteh/Paisley pattern. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, Yann. It lacks wow to me (the fact that it is a work of Ansel Adams, doesn't change it) and I don't understand what is so special about it. We can take a similar shot today with much more detail than here. Poco a poco (talk) 09:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for all comments. Yann (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wieskirche 12.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2025 at 07:44:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info This is not the pulpit, but the Abbot's box; the pulpit is located on the opposite side of the nave; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting for me Cmao20 (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Lindli. Rheinuferpark Schaffhausen.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 17:00:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Schaffhausen
Info Just a really nice composition in my opinion. created by Hauserphoton – uploaded by Hauserphoton – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:05, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good compo with pleasing leading lines. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant composition. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Terragio67 (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Schaffhausen

File:নীল-গলা বসন্তবৌরি, নওগাঁ.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 16:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Megalaimidae (Asian Barbets)
Info created by Sanjoykumar99 – uploaded by Sanjoykumar99 – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice close up but in my opinion oversharpened Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tropical Milkweed and Large Milkweed Bug - Oncopeltus fasciatus, Arthur Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Boynton Beach, Florida, February 7, 2022 (53498119215).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 20:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Apocynaceae
Info Tropical Milkweed and Large Milkweed Bug - Oncopeltus fasciatus, Arthur Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Boynton Beach, Florida, February 7, 2022. Created by Judy Gallagher – uploaded from Flickr by Jarble – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great quality, nice light and clearly educational, but for me there are too many close, random crops (all four sides) in the composition. --Cart (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I agree with Cart, interesting photo and definitely educational but composition is not outstanding and nor is the image quality (poor sharpness). Could be a better VI than FP Cmao20 (talk) 16:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orchards in snow, Sangla, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2025 at 20:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is where delicious Kinnauri apples come from, and the snow is essential for their growth. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful place, but the photo is too dark. Looking at the histogram for it, there is absolutely no white at all like you'd expect from a photo of a snowy landscape. --Cart (talk) 23:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: Thanks for the review, I've uploaded a new version with exposure adjusted, please see -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:52, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, this is better. Detail at full size could be better, but it's a large file so it works. A good reminder that India can be snowy too, we Europeans tend to forget that. --Cart (talk) 11:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The big shadow in the foreground isn't my favourite thing but I like this view and the story behind it Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also we have very few FPs of Himalaya in winter. Yann (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 19:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful winter scenery, and I have always imagined the paradise as a natural orchard … – Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#India

File:1907 Ultra High Relief $20 Double Eagle (Inverted Edge Letters).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2025 at 19:07:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Monetary items#United States coins
Info created by Heritage Auctions – uploaded by Godot13 – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support By many, the Saint-Gaudens double eagle is considered to be the most beautiful American coin minted to date. This is a flawless example of one of the ultra high relief ones. -- JayCubby (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 22:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well made, good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 19:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery fixed due to yet another new gallery page: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Monetary items bringing some better order to coins, banknotes, stocks, stamps, wampum, cowrie shells, whatever. Please let me know any mistakes you may find on the page. --Cart (talk) 22:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Monetary items#United States coins

File:Halle(Saale) Tram beim Steintor asv2024-04 img1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 20:30:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Germany
Info Tram Düwag MGT6D on route 5 in Halle (Saale) -- all by me --A.Savin 20:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light and excellent image quality Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but the buildings on both sides are leaning slightly. I know it's not an architectural shot but it's still quite noticeable and an easy fix. BigDom (talk) 06:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work with photo settings! Due to the needed shorter exposure time, the matrix display text is only partially visible, but this is unavoidable --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. This is a good technical photo, but I can't figure out what's special about it. The light is not very interesting to me, and the gray elements of the tram blend in a bit with the background. -- Jakubhal 06:14, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good but the picture is slightly tilted to the right. --imehling (talk) 07:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Totaly agree with Jakubhal, an ordinary shot to me Poco a poco (talk) 06:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Germany

File:Blick über Krötenbruck zur goldenen Stunde 20250305 HOF5013 RAW-Export cens.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 18:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
Info View over Krötenbruck to the Kornberg at the golden hour in a special mood, created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty light Cmao20 (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a very good documentary photo of this place and a solid QI, but I'm sorry, I can't find that 'wow' sense in it for an FP. --Cart (talk) 11:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eastern Subterranean Termite - Reticulitermes flavipes and Rove Beetle (Aleocharinae subfamily), Robert W. Duncan Wildlife Management Area, Ruther Glen, Virginia, May 18, 2023 (53531674791).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2025 at 14:24:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Termitidae_(Termites)
Info Eastern Subterranean Termite - Reticulitermes flavipes and Rove Beetle (Aleocharinae subfamily), Robert W. Duncan Wildlife Management Area, Ruther Glen, Virginia, May 18, 2023. Created by Judy Gallagher – uploaded from Flickr by Jarble – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely interesting but sadly unsharp Cmao20 (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tiburón gris (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-17, DD 86.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 16:52:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Carcharhinidae (Requiem Sharks)
Info Grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) hidding in a reef, Red Sea, Egypt. Note: we have no FPs of the species Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A strange view, but a very interesting one, especially when your brain makes sense of the perspective. Cmao20 (talk) 18:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting composition. The viewer's concentrated gaze on the eye gives a slightly uncomfortable feeling, it seems threatening and captivating at the same time. Something different and, in my opinion, worthy of FP. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why is this image so grainy? That's unexpected on only ISO 400 with a fullframe sensor (even if it has 50MPx). The composition may be novel enough for FP status, but I can't really discern the details of the shark skin, they get drowned in the noise. Additionally, the lighting balance feels a bit off between the shark and the foreground. I can think about a way to make the image likely gain a support from me: Reduce locally the exposition on the bluish elements (corals?) bottom left and right and reduce the noise. I admit that this is nitpicking on a really high level... Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 16:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Certainly an unusual composition, but I'm not a fan of that much unfocused foreground. Granted, it's more difficult to get some sort of bokeh going for the front than the back, but this just looks messy. Had the placement of the shark in the opening been different, it might have worked but sorry this is not it. There is also a good amount of chroma noise in the image. --Cart (talk) 18:19, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Юрий Д.К 18:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the shadow, the distracting foreground, and the head partly hidden, make the picture unexceptional in my view. It would be completely hidden, the picture would have been even less interesting, but currently the content is not clear enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ok, I take it back. It isn't going anywhere from here. Thank you for your feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silver and gold scrap metal.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2025 at 14:50:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry#Others
Info Happy Easter everybody! All gold and silversmiths have a couple of boxes with scrap metals, to use for small projects, castings or to recycle. Some years ago I played with mine to make Easter cards. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 14:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 14:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I just found this picture and was going to nominate it myself. So... YES from me. :-) // Zquid (talk) 15:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something new Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Creative idea with a smiley as an egg yolk :) -- Radomianin (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Interesting photo, well-composed, though I'd sharpen it just a hair. Out of curiosity, what's the scale on the photograph? I'm guessing that it's no more than a quarter-ounce of gold and probably a few ounces in silver, but that's based on very little at all (I've never known jewellers to work with large pieces of precious metals). JayCubby (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was just enough scrap metal to make a fun Easter card with, not the entire 4 kilos in the boxes. I've added scale in the description, the two gold rings in the photo have an inner diameter of about 18,5 mm. --Cart (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasing arrangement and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Geology and chemistry#Others

File:Pine warbler (90070).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 02:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)
Info Pine warbler (Setophaga pinus). Been trying to get a good shot of these hyperactive little guys for a while. Debated this one. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute and very sharp. – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect fluffy little ball of energy. --Cart (talk) 19:52, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cart. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:44, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support perfectly in focus, in optimal lighting conditions. --Terragio67 (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)

File:The Umbrella Workshop.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 07:22:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Artisans (craftspeople)
Info Woman working on paper umbrellas (or parasols) in an umbrella workshop in Myanmar. Created and uploaded by Sopyaylynn, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 07:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the contrast between the wide area with the white paper umbrellas and the colourful clothes and threads/yarns of the working woman. -- Aristeas (talk) 07:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great find! --Cart (talk) 10:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a stunning capture, and with POTY finalist potential. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What is actually happening here? The lady is working with one umbrella, why are the rest standing in the sand? —kallerna (talk) 17:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When you wonder something like this, a good bet is always to go to the WP article about the subject: Oil-paper umbrella#Basic production process. The umbrellas stuck in the sand are obviously at stage 3, where they are exposed to sunlight after being oiled and trimmed. She is working on decorating one that is at stage 4. Sometimes such umbrellas are painted and sometimes decorated with string patterns on the underside [1]. --Cart (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the perfect summary, Cart! – Aristeas (talk) 07:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 18:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 19:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rolf Kranz (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 10:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Felino Volador (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing subject and viewpoint! The uniformity of the white umbrellas contrasts with the vivid colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing. TheBritinator (talk) 18:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice image. Good compo, similar to market with tendas. --Mile (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Work#Artisans (craftspeople)

File:Велушки манастир 11.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 14:14:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice view but my instinct is that this picture is underexposed Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agree with Cmao20. @Деан, Kiril: Here is a brighter version; if you like it, you can upload it over the current version. But it could be better if you do the brightening yourself on the base of the original file from the camera (to avoid quality loss due to the repeated compressing). Or, if you like, give me access to the original file from the camera, then I try to edit it. Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment brighter version is FP for me. I would support it Юрий Д.К 18:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac d'Oo (38).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 20:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Garonne
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! Good call to include the branches on the left to brighten up the shadowy part of the image. --Cart (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support very beautiful and detailed. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The waterfall and the clouds on the right make the picture appear like a beautiful panoramic painting. The branches are adding depth to the picture and are a supporting breaking element. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colors, great detail, wonderful composition. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --Plozessor (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cart and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 15:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:57, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Haute-Garonne

File:Smoke from the 2020 California wildfires tinting the sunset red on the Swedish west coast 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 21:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art
Info On September 19, the smoke from the 2020 Western United States wildfires reached Sweden. On the news and the weather forecast, we were promised red-tinted sunsets for a while. - Yes we got it, our own Orange Skies Day. This is the sun setting in the Atlantic as seen from the West Coast of Sweden. Photo taken from Stångehuvud nature reserve, Lysekil, Sweden, including three of the large lighthouses in the area. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, unusual composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful pattern in the sky; balanced composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:16, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but won't Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun be a better category? UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I hesitate to call anything caused by human actions a 'Natural phenomena'. Quote from the en-wiki article: "Climate change and poor forest management practices contributed". I think the chosen gallery is a good and neutral place for a photo that relies so heavily on compact black silhouettes and strong block colors. It’s almost more like a graphic print than a photo. --Cart (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The way I saw it, this was a good depiction of what the setting sun does to smoke-filled skies, regardless of where the smoke came from. But your explanation raises a worthy question about how truly natural the overall phenomenon really was. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: I think this would be in Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena. Yann (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said above, I hesitate since this was caused by humans. Sure, there are wildfires in the US every year, but human mismanagement made them so big the smoke was noticed in Sweden. That's not normal, the same way buildings destroyed by war is not the same as buildings destroyed by storms or earthquakes. Anyway, I think it works very well as photo poster art. A lot of the photos in the photo techniques can be in other galleries as well. --Cart (talk) 14:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I see your point. Yann (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art

File:Osprey Fish Eye.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 21:26:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Pandion
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support There aren't any action shots in the featured picture gallery for Pandion (Osprey.)-- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 06:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice action, but the editing is too heavy on the dark tones. I'm not too wild about the png format for this kind of picture. --Cart (talk) 08:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your constructive feedback. I have old files on my PC in .PNG, and I have made a concerted effort to upload to wikimedia in .JPG. This one got past me. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Pandion

File:Bertice Redding 2 Allan Warren.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 22:18:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
Info created and uploaded by Allan Warren, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 22:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose She has a lovely smile, but this is not a very good portrait photo of her. The photographer has managed to click at a bad time/angle where she looks lazy-eyed. Googling other photos of her, this is not how she normally appears. It doesn't look to me like she has an eye condition or drooping eyelid. --Cart (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cart: I am surprised that you seem to make a medical diagnostic based a picture. Could you explain please? Other pictures from the Library of Congress in Category:Bertice Reading are so bad that we can't barely see anything. Yann (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I expressed myself too short and in a clumsy way – now fixed. For an FP of a person, I'd like that photo to represent that person well, regardless of whether we have better photos of them on Commons or not. In this case I went online and googled her. There are plenty of good photos of her outside Commons, and in none of them does it look like she had a droopy eyelid, and since the look occurs only in this photo, I don't think it represents her well. I also went online to search for any mention of her eyes, and the only thing I could find was that her mother once hit her so hard she got a black eye. The reason I checked this, is because there are plenty of famous people with all sorts of eye conditions, and they have made that look part of their "brand" (as people say these days). For droopy eyelid we have notably Forest Whitaker, Maggie Smith, Paris Hilton, Kate Hudson, Ryan Gosling, etc. And for other eye conditions there are for example Marty Feldman, Jean-Paul Sartre, Peter Falk, Sammy Davis, Jr. all the way to Andrea Bocelli and Stevie Wonder. So before I blamed the photographer for a bad angle, I wanted to see if this was how she usually presented herself. I don't think we need to feature a photo just because it's the best one we have uploaded on this site. --Cart (talk) 17:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, her name is misspelled in the file name. Her last name is Reading, not Redding. --Cart (talk) 17:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I will rename the file when the period is over. I still think that is how she looks like around 1981. Yann (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- I don't think the facial expression is FP-worthy. JayCubby (talk) 12:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eastern barn owl (Tyto javanica) close up.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 06:39:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Tytonidae (Barn Owls)
Info created & uploaded by Mdkshots – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 06:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 06:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice framing but it lacks sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but agree with Poco a Poco. Nice closeup but not sharp enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haigerloch - Altstadt - Ansicht aus Süden vom Römerturm (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 19:06:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info Haigerloch, Germany: view of the old town with its picturesque location in a bend of the Eyach river. In the centre Haigerloch Castle and its castle church. View from south from the Römerturm. All by – Aristeas (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good candidate as I commented when you asked for my feedback on it Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and thank you again for your good advice! – Aristeas (talk) 08:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --imehling (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed view of the lower town of Haigerloch with natural colors, strong depth and clear focus on the castle church. Great documentary value. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rolf Kranz (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:45, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good! Юрий Д.К 16:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, and an absolute delight to see such detail and high image quality in such a photo. --Cart (talk) 09:15, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 15:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

File:Bald eagle in Alaska 2016-3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 18:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Haliaeetus
Info created by Andy Morffew – uploaded and nominated by Юрий Д.К 18:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I said on the previous nomination of an Andy Morffew picture, his work is nearly all QI or FP Cmao20 (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support In my opinion, the noise filter was applied a little too generously, but the wow factor of this great photo prevails. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support an interesting moment captured. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and UnpetitproleX. There is some tiny outlining around the feathers in the top-left corner; probably some problems with the masking of the background during editing. That could be improved, but it does not impair the great photo. – Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aristeas: Hi! I think that there are traces of chromatic aberration correction. I've tried to improve in Photoshop but the results hasn't convinced me. I'm not sure that they can be fixed without overall quality loss. Thank for your assessment! Юрий Д.К 17:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hello Юрий Д.К, thank you for trying it. I think we can just ignore these traces as they are very minor; therefore I have voted with full support for the photo. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ZarlokX (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 22:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, a majestic motif --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Aquila

File:Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (6).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 19:59:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lavish church and very well composed Cmao20 (talk) 01:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo of this exemplary ceiling. Maybe less noise reduction would yield a little bit more sharpness, but that’s a matter of taste. – Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy

File:Spectacled Weaver - South Africa - 2023-1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 18:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
Info created by Andy Morffew – uploaded and nominated by Юрий Д.К 18:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice use of lead room, and sharp where it matters Cmao20 (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors, convincing composition with enough negative space. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 06:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 08:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ZarlokX (talk) 11:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin... – Terragio67 (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support If freedom was a photo. --Cart (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 22:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)

File:Cornelis Troost 001.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 14:11:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Equestrian scenes (people riding horses)
Info created by Cornelis Troost – uploaded by Vincent Steenberg – nominated by Kasir -- Kasir (talk) 14:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 14:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose By the standards for painting we have now at FPC, this is a rather small file. Troost is at his best when he depicts groups of people and their interactions, often with some humor or tongue-in-cheek. He sometimes did equestrian scenes because that was the fashion at the time, but they always come off slightly stiff and awkward. --Cart (talk) 11:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooden house (window shutters), Riga.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2025 at 07:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info This wooden house, located in Riga's Latgale district, was built in 1813 according to the building plan for the Jesus Church Quarter. Originally located in St. John Street, it is now 1 Elias Street. The weathered shutters offer a close-up view of the multi-layered history of early 19th-century wooden architecture in the city. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Representative detail of a typical historical wooden house with rich wood textures and beautiful ornaments. The lateral light emphasizes textures and three-dimensionality. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 11:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice study in colours, shapes, and textures, with a satisfying and well-chosen composition Cmao20 (talk) 20:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect layering. --Cart (talk) 09:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows

File:Peacock butterfly (Aglais io) on cherry blossom.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2025 at 14:14:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Papilionoidea#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Matejin – uploaded by Matejin – nominated by Matejin -- Matejin (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Matejin (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hi Matejin and welcome to FPC. This is a nice composition and you have a good eye for a photo - thank you for uploading this useful image. However, I am afraid that the image quality is not FP level. The picture is quite noisy and the detail at pixel level is not very high - unfortunately I don't think whatever equipment you used is capable of producing an FP quality photo. Also the closest wing is not in focus. Perhaps have a look at some of the other butterfly FPs we have recently promoted in the gallery to get an idea of what works - additionally, it may be worth trying QIC first to get feedback on issues like image quality, noise etc. before jumping straight to FPC. One other thing, I note that this image is uncategorised. I'm going to add some categories for you on the file page - in future uploads it would be good if you could do that, so that people can find your image easily if they want to use it. Cmao20 (talk) 20:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Our Lady of Sameiro sanctuary in Braga (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2025 at 18:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info Majestic, well composed photo of a beautiful church. 9th prize in WLM Portugal 2024. created by Tournasol7 – uploaded by Tournasol7 – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful light and nice mood. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --Cart (talk) 09:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 15:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Balanced composition, wonderful lighting mood and clear architectural representation. Technical quality is high, documentary value is convincing. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful light. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 11:04, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal

File:Blick vom Leinpfad bei Neuenheimer Landstraße 38-2 über den Neckar zur Stadthalle Heidelberg.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2025 at 04:05:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 04:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful view and a nice use of natural framing Cmao20 (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 19:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 05:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good framing and quality. Nice placement of the typical tourist boat in front of the Stadthalle; the boat also hides some of the (rather irritating) cars, that’s good. – Aristeas (talk) 07:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20 and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 05:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Gandaca harina (Horsfield, 1829) - Tree Yellow (Male) WLB.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2025 at 15:18:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Papilionoidea#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would crop some of the blurry foreground, but regardless, this is nice and should be FP Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 18:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've fixed the gallery. Since we now have so many beautiful butterfly photos (yay!), they now have a gallery page of their own. The rest of the Lepidoptera stays on the old page. Keep filling those gallery pages and we will create more to hold all the photos. :-) --Cart (talk) 18:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC) striked per the newer comments UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is good, but the subject is partially obscured by the ground and the blury area in the foreground is disturbing, Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but per Poco a poco - part of the subject is obscured -- Jakubhal 18:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lovely butterfly, but per Poco. If only there had been a little sharp space right below the whole butterfly, but it dipping into it is less than ideal. --Cart (talk) 21:21, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco a poco --Rbrechko (talk) 10:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Yann (talk) 18:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'm generally a fan of atmospheric blur, but in this case the dominant out-of-focus foreground feels more distracting than enhancing. A tighter crop with less blur would have served this lovely subject better, in my humble opinion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per newer comments. --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blick über die Saale zum Bad Kissinger Rosengarten Mai 2024 2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 06:53:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This picture is perfectly pleasant and it looks like a lovely day but I am missing any great tension to the composition. Everything is straight parallel lines - the bank of the river, the grass, the row of buildings - and there's nothing to give the eye a bit of contrast, nothing to really invite us into the scene. Therefore for me this is QI but not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, technically good but this sort of photo works better if it includes less or more. If you crop it, you can let the viewer's gaze rest on something; if you make it larger, you get a full panorama. This in between looks random, especially with the cut fountain to the right. One idea could be to emphasize on the trees and call the new photo something like "Three kinds of trees in Bad Kissinger Rosengarten". See image note. --Cart (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, will consider that. --Plozessor (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination

File:Orange-headed thrush - কমলা দামা (Geokichla citrina), Gazipur, Bangladesh.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2025 at 13:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Turdidae (Thrushes)
Info created by Mahmudul Bari – uploaded by Mahmudul Bari – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little bit noisy and oversharpened, but a good composition and a beautiful bird Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Such a beautiful composition etc., but too much sharpening for my poor eyes. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Aristeas --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baikal, Cape Burhan, Olkhon Island, Lake Baikal, Russia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 21:36:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
Info Cape Burhan with Shamanka Rock. Olkhon Island. The symbol of Lake Baikal. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice view and interesting place, I love the cliff (!). Looking at the far shore of the lake, the photo seems a little tilted. It's also a bit soft with a lot of highlights. Any chance of some more sharpness and toning down the highlights? --Cart (talk) 22:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can fix the tilt and put more sharpness into it. But what about the highlights? What do you mean by ‘toning down highlights’? The histogram is balanced, there is no overexposure or clipping. The midday light is a bit harsh but actually beneficial for a marble/quartz/graphite rock like this. Maybe by ‘toning down highlights’ you meant ‘raising up shadows’ or what? --Argenberg (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I meant that even though the histogram is fine, some of the highlight colors are rather glaring. Such things don't show up in a histogram since it only shows the color as other than white. Take a look at how rich it looks with only a 3% reduction of highlights in this example. The difference is most noticeable in things like the white sign with text. That version is also corrected for tilt. (Feel free to use it in any manner if you like.) --Cart (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reprocessed the file according to your suggestions. --Argenberg (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much! Looks great now. --Cart (talk) 16:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support nice autumn view of the lake. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A truly beautiful and convincing composition of the motifs presented in the photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very picturesque scenery with good light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District

File:La Défense vue depuis la Tour Eiffel.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 23:46:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France
Info created, uploaded and nominated by ZarlokX -- ZarlokX (talk) 23:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ZarlokX (talk) 23:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question Blue tint? Why PNG? Yann (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A light blue tint for the aesthetic and a PNG format to reduce compression. ZarlokX (talk) 23:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Then Oppose. The blue tint should be corrected, and JPEG with no or very little compression is better for pictures. Yann (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this picture is tilted - the buildings don't appear straight - and there is some purple chromatic aberration that could be removed. If those issues are corrected I will support because this is a detailed and useful panorama. I don't think it matters that it is PNG. Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pepper No. 14, 1929.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 12:19:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Plants
Info created by Edward Weston, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry no, to me this is not a good photo. The pepper may be interesting, but the surface it's on is tilted and the background unfortunately comes of like some badly converted halftone pattern that doesn't match the pepper. There is also a thin white border to the left. --Cart (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cart: The halftone background is part of the original picture. All copies on the Internet have it. I am not sure about the tilt, so I rotated it. The white border is gone. Yann (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but unfortunately the background is too annoying for me whatever it is. My vote stays. --Cart (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support To give this candidate a little love: While I share Cart’s unease about the background etc., I also understand Weston’s fascination for the bizarre shape of this pepper. It looks like a carefully crafted little sculpture, and depending on your state of mind you can see in it a complicated sexual scene from the Kama Sutra, or a couple in protective embracing of their new-born child, or a pietà with Saint Mary weeping over the body of her dead son, etc. The lighting and perspective seem simple, but are perfect to emphasize the multivalency of this pepper. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. My own first instinct when I saw this was that it was a sculpture of two in embrace. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:28, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Promotion because of the interesting shape and the historical value in the art of photography. It is a pity that the pattern in the background is irritating, we do not know if Edward Weston chose it deliberately or carelessly. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment They way I see it, is that we already have the best pepper from this series as an FP, File:Pepper No. 30.jpg, and that makes me more picky about a second photo from it. In most series of similar objects, there is one photo that stands out and represents the collection. --Cart (talk) 10:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plum-headed parakeet (Psittacula cyanocephala) male feeding on sunflower 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2025 at 07:59:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
Info created & uploaded by Mdkshots – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 07:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 07:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The tail being cut out is a shame. And why only 3000 pixels from a camera capable of 6000 pixels? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice shot but just too oversharpened to me, plus the cut tail Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feeding lineated barbet NBG Dhaka.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 06:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Megalaimidae (Asian Barbets)
Info created by Mahmudul Bari – uploaded by Mahmudul Bari – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 06:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 06:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot Poco a poco (talk) 09:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I fixed the creator name. --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is only okay but this is a stunning photo Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a texture in the backgroung. --Harlock81 (talk) 18:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, the background is not well edited. Looks like much of the "bokeh" was done in post and not very successfully. --Cart (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Due to the posterization lines in the bokeh to the right in the photo. Will change to 'support' if it's fixed --Cart (talk) 22:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:55, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Megalaimidae (Asian Barbets)

File:Indian pitta-বন সুন্দরীর গায়কী ঢং.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 18:37:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Pittidae (Pittas)
Info The Indian pitta (Pitta brachyura), Gazipur, Bangladesh. created by Mahmudul Bari – uploaded by Mahmudul Bari – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good photo overall but not as sharp as it could be IMO Cmao20 (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it's a pretty bird but it's small in the image and even so not sharp or detailed. --Cart (talk) 21:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for the comments — it will be helpful for future nominations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moheen (talk • contribs) 12:32, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej w Kacwinie.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 14:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
Info This was the winner of Wiki Loves Monuments Poland in 2024. I've gone with 'natural' for the category because the chapel is only a small feature of the image rather than its main subject. created by Gswito – uploaded by Gswito – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would go with 'Places/Other' since everything except the mountains is agricultural fields with fences between them, and that is man-made land although covered with snow. --Cart (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think Natural is a better category. The mountains are a big part of the picture, and the land, even if cultivated by humans is still Nature. Yann (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's the mindset that anything growing, cultivated or other, is 'Nature' that's got us in much of the mess the planet is in today. But that's a discussion for another time and place. --Cart (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cart, please change it if you think that'd be for the best! You do a great job of organising the galleries and I won't insist on the gallery I initially chose if this one would fit better. Cmao20 (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{s}}~~ --Harlock81 (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 18:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Disregarding the philosophical discussion, the composition is great and the landscape beautiful. Unfortunately there is a lot(!) of CA noise and chroma noise in it, and that's why I don't give it my full support. --Cart (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yes I see what you mean but I wouldn't say a lot, it's there and visible mainly in the mountains in the background but I don't think it distracts from the composition and I don't find it noticeable except at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, it's in the chapel, trees and bushes too. I've made you a cleaned up version here. If you want it, you can do what you will with it. --Cart (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your version is pretty obviously better (well done). But I'm not sure of the ethics of replacing a picture when the author is unlikely to see the replacement or be able to assent to it (seems only to be active at WLM time). Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You can always make it an 'Alternative', but you have to do without me for a while. I twisted my knee on my walk through the forest this afternoon and it hurts like hell, so I'm grumpier than usual now and I obviously do not belong in polite society. Sorry! --Cart (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Many thanks for the well-done editing, Cart – and I am so sorry for the accident, get well soon! Well, IMHO we should not upload the improved version over the current one, and maybe even the author itself should better not do that: This photo won the 1st price of WLM 2024 in Poland, and because exactly that version won the price, major changes are a no-go according to COM:OW. (Unlike the current wording of that page, I think that noise removal is a major change because it is a global manipulation and significantly changes the appearance of an image; at least I would not overwrite any of my own local WLM or WLE winning images with additional noise reduction). But there is a simple solution which has been used for many other FP candidates: Please, Cmao20, upload the edited version as a new file, linking it to the original one with {{Derived from}}. Then you, Cmao20, can either offer it as an alternative version or (much simpler) just exchange the candidate here with the edited version – whatever you prefer. I would appreciate it very much if you could do the one or the other, because this is such a wonderful winter scene and now, thanks to Cart’s editing, much improved. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no Cart, that sounds really painful - I'm so sorry to hear it. I've only just read the section about your accident. Please take all the time you need to rest and recover. We'll miss your presence, but your well-being comes first. Wishing you a gentle and speedy healing! -- Radomianin (talk) 08:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Painkillers rule! At least for some light voting and editing. No serious or complicated discussions though. ;-) --Cart (talk) 09:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Painkillers have also become my friends since the surgery, but please be careful that they don't do any harm in the end. I wish you a good recovery, especially that it doesn't get worse. All the best :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Юрий Д.К 18:33, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version

Alternative version with colour noise removed, thanks to Cart (and hope you feel better soon). Support and pinging Cart, Harlock81, Jakubhal, Aristeas, and Юрий Д.К, it would be appreciated if you could review the new version! Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better, yes. Thanks. --Harlock81 (talk) 20:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for Cart's improved alternative provided by Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support this version. I was going to oppose the original due to the obvious (but fixable) issues. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:33, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 23:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A wonderful scenery, now even better thanks to Cart’s editing – thank you for uploading and nominating, Cmao20! – Aristeas (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even more for this version ---- Jakubhal 06:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ZarlokX (talk) 11:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks Cart, and take care of your health. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per above with problems now fixed. --Cart (talk) 09:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 23:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rolf Kranz (talk) 18:55, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Poland

The chosen alternative is: File:Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej w Kacwinie, edited.jpg

File:Botete cara de perro (Arothron nigropunctatus), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-25, DD 267.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 13:15:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Tetraodontidae_(Pufferfish)
Info A colorful Blackspotted puffer (Arothron nigropunctatus), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe a little bit dark? But wow look at that detail on the fish's scales! Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I uploaded a brigther version Poco a poco (talk) 08:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer this new version, thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support In thumbnail: a weirdly flashy puzzling colour blob. At 100%: lots of discoveries possible. Yes, this is a really great image! Grand-Duc (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 18:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. (Could you try whether it looks even better when the exposure is raised a bit? Thanks!) – Aristeas (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Tetraodontidae_(Pufferfish)

File:Blick über den Achensee nach Pertisau.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 17:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:00, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 18:33, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A majestic view! Cmao20 (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Support Fixed now! The dark vertical blotch, above the cloud in the center, is very distracting. JayCubby (talk) 00:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JayCubby I guess you're right, but now it should be fixed - please have a look! --Plozessor (talk) 04:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plozessor Yes, you are right -- now changed! JayCubby (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:12, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol

File:Klay Nag Mandir (crop).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2025 at 21:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info A minimal but pleasing composition of a small, little-known, antique temple in a glade on a high ridge deep in the hills of Bhadarwah, Jammu. Edited by me for a square crop to center the temple and reduce shadows slightly. Created and uploaded by Raja Irfan Wani – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The square crop and symmetrical composition convinces me. Though I would have wished for better light. Cmao20 (talk) 20:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the unpretentious charm of this little temple, it’s crisp and sharp, and for me it’s a bonus that the photo was taken in a really remote place – checking a map and comparing aerial imagery I see that the photographer must have taken a long hike. – Aristeas (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The subject is indeed interesting but the compo is too boring, flat and centered. Furthermore the level of detail is not outstanding. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bummer that this picture is headed towards a non-feature due to lack of enthusiasm, for this may be one of the only images—and of such fortunate quality—of this very remote temple (and even of this specific type of architecture) not just on commons but also on the internet in general. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyramid roof of Piramide Shopping Center (Blok 44, Belgrade).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 18:31:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Glass ceilings and skylights
Info Pyramid roof of Piramide Shopping Center (Blok 44, Belgrade). Shot and edited on phone, smudges on windows removed in PS. -- Mile (talk) 18:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info Squares, triangles on roof combined with (half)spiral stairs on left, crop 1/3 - 2/3.
Support -- Mile (talk) 18:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very aggressive contrast and high key photo, but surprisingly, somehow it works. --Cart (talk) 22:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cold ambiance and the content is unexceptional in my view. Overall it's quite a common modern architecture with square patterns, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sure what is featurable here, the compo doesn't work for me Poco a poco (talk) 12:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, I like the idea but the abstract patterns aren't really speaking to me here Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 10:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Koch woman.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 12:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
Info This beautiful picture of a Koch woman in rural Bangladesh is a quiet moment full of warmth, texture, and storytelling. The light, colors, and composition draw the viewer in with a natural elegance. The current version has been slightly improved by the nominator - with the author's permission - through gentle tonal and color adjustments, as well as slight denoising. Created and uploaded by Nayeem01771031233 – edited and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 13:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 13:51, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the calm and serene beauty of this scene – the woman really seems to communicate with the animal, not needing any words, and the flowers, unexpectedly growing from the bare ground, add a tiny surreal touch to the image. – Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:57, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Aristeas. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but with reserve about the technical aspect. Concerning the image, nice composition and decent quality. I agree with Aristeas. But the resolution, only 3,629 × 2,419 pixels from a camera capable of 6,240 x 4,160 pixels. And the settings, exposure time 1/4,000 sec with 640 ISO, it isn't really justified in such a situation, in my opinion. Certainly the resolution could have been more generous with better parameters -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Basile. I've contacted the author by email and asked if he could provide a higher resolution version of the original file. If he sends one, I'll be happy to update the image accordingly. I appreciate your technical observation! Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Update: @Basile – I've now received a kind and thoughtful reply from the author Nayeem via email. Unfortunately, he no longer has access to a high-res version of the photo. In agreement with him, I'd like to quote his words here: "Unfortunately, I don't have a higher resolution version of that image." I apologize that this update isn't more satisfying. Thanks again for your careful review. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Radomianin, for the initiative and for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per the nomination --Kritzolina (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The woman has a beautiful, gentle facial expression to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 05:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clearly outstanding Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 04:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Great scene, on the other side the compo is too static (too centered) and the res too low Poco a poco (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your constructive feedback, Poco. I actually discussed this image via email with a couple of fellow Wikimedians previously and had originally suggested a crop - cropping the left side and applying the rule of thirds on the right to add more visual interest, which would have resulted in a derivative work. But in the end, I decided to stick with the original composition. On the second look, the centered framing felt like it brought out the calm and light of the scene in a way that worked really well. I also wanted to stay true to the photographer's original intent. That said, I totally get where you're coming from - your take was actually my first instinct too. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Standing people

File:Darband, Téhéran (3).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2025 at 11:23:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Food_and_drink#Sweet_food
Info created, uploaded and nominated by ZarlokX -- ZarlokX (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ZarlokX (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good composition, but there is a lot of chromatic aberration that needs to be fixed. I also think this could benefit from a crop on the right to center the stall. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but it's an oppose from me until the CA and editing quality mentioned above is fixed. Otherwise a nice shot. --Cart (talk) 22:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antiopelle (Antiopella cristata) (Ifremer 00576-68854).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 12:22:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Gastropoda
Info Antiopella cristata is a nudibranch found in the North Sea, the North-East Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Its body, with a maximum size of 8 cm, is flat, elongated and hidden by numerous outgrowths, the cerata, whose extremities are pale blue. The colour of these animals varies from milky white to light orange. The main sensory organs of nudibranchs are their rhinophores, which detect chemical particles present in the water, including food, the pheromones of a possible sexual partner, or the presence of certain threats.
Info created by Olivier Dugornay, uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 12:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- vip (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~weak~~ Support ~~because there's some fringing on the left, if those can be corrected I will lend full support.~~ --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Cart for the improvements. I like that a lot of the natural blue of cerata remains preserved even after the CA removal. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Quite nice and well composed but I agree about the colour fringing and also prefer the existing FP Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oh well... If people are going to vote for this despite the fixable technical problems, we might as well have a fixed version. Here is one, fringing fixed, some sharpness, noise reduction and contrast. Do with it what you will. --Cart (talk) 17:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cart: Thanks a lot! I uploaded your version over the old one. @UnpetitproleX and Cmao20: What do you think? Yann (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cart (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Decent detail but tight crop and not the best ligthing Poco a poco (talk) 16:32, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Gastropoda

File:Bydgoszcz Waterfront 2023.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2025 at 09:35:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
Info created by Mariusz Guć – uploaded by Nakiel – nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 09:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 09:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd like to know more about the statue suspended on the ropes Cmao20 (talk) 20:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Its The River Crosser. He is inspired by The Archer (which is one of the city icons), and was inaugurated on the day when Poland joined the EU. I also added it to the file description. EUPBR (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but to me the point for this photo is not optimal. The statue is such a prominent thing in the foreground, and now it's tangled up in the boats. Might be better taking the photo from a few steps to the right, to get the statue over the water only. --Cart (talk) 17:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palm warbler (90385).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 19:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)
Info Palm warbler (Setophaga palmarum). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 12:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, fluffy, high-quality! -- Radomianin (talk) 17:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ++ --Plozessor (talk) 06:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Pro for the subjct as we have no FPs of this species, contra for the shadows and the low detail (e.g. the eye, it also looks like shake blur in part of the plumage). Poco a poco (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Though probably not in my interest to do so, I should point out there is one other FP of this species. That one has a better comp, but smaller/less detail. YMMV. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:29, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)

File:Alcaudón culiblanco (Eurocephalus ruppelli), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-25, DD 71.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 13:34:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
Info Northern white-crowned shrike (Eurocephalus ruppelli), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. Note: we have no FPs of the whole genus Eurocephalus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super high resolution, one of our biggest bird pictures Cmao20 (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~His head is on the edge, should be more space above. You should clean green CA in bottom of the bird (actually around the wooden sticks)~~. --Mile (talk) 17:50, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mile: Done Poco a poco (talk) 06:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 22:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me, but feel free to fix the CA mentioned by Mile. --Cart (talk) 22:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Poco a poco (talk) 06:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Mile (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and even better now. – Aristeas (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)

File:Abstract pattern on a tree stump.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 18:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Plants
Info Abstract pattern on a tree stump, high-contrast black-and-white photo. Created and uploaded by Maksim Sokolov (Maxergon), nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The annual rings combine with traces of the saw and the wide cracks to form a complex organic pattern. The jagged leaves lying in the cracks add a further dimension. – Yes, I know, the contrast is high and therefore it is obvious to shout ‘Overprocessed!’. But while I would say that for a colour shot, high contrast is an established technique for black-and-white photographs. When I made a print on high contrast photo paper, the result looked the same. So this is not a newfangled digital effect. In addition, the high contrast here serves a clear purpose: it emphasizes the quality of the image as a semi-abstract pattern. – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support works for me. Possibly could be tilted forward just a little? but fine as is. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:23, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Great find! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The author made the absolutely best use of that tree stump. --Cart (talk) 19:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, the leaves are a nice addition --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now that is what I call a WOW! --Kritzolina (talk) 16:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 04:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:32, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Black and White#Plants

File:徐渭花卉图卷.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2025 at 11:45:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Plants - wide
Info uploaded by shizhao (talk) – nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- shizhao (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very beautiful painting, but could you please give a bit more information about it in English for us who can't read it. From Google I get that it's a "Flower Picture Book", but it's harder to translate any part of the texts in the scroll. I've changed the gallery to the more appropriate 'Plants'. If it is promoted, we will simply create a 'Plants – wide' section for it. --Cart (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Never mind, I found a description on the source page and added it to the file page. Also fixed up the categories a bit. Please remember these steps for your next nomination. --Cart (talk) 16:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting work of art, good quality for its age, good reproduction. But I second Cart about more information. Yann (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you have problems opening this large file, please use this link, it shows the scroll large enough to see the details without freezing your browser. --Cart (talk) 16:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Plants - wide

File:Gold chain with gemstones and enamel, late 16th century, The Royal Armoury, Sweden.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 10:42:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Jewellery
Info One of the most stunning gold chains in The Royal Armoury of Sweden. It's made of 4.5 kg solid gold with enamel, garnets and rock crystals. The photographer works with some of the most notable Swedish museum collections. The photo was recently promoted to FP on en-wiki. Created by Erik Lernestål – uploaded by LSHuploadBot – nominated by W.carter, -- Cart (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed, stunning! Yann (talk) 11:37, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive work! -- Radomianin (talk) 12:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not really fond of just plopping an object on a white background but I guess it makes the photo more useful Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand exactly what you mean, I usually don't go for that either. But in this case I think the incredible craftmanship that goes into making a chain like this plus the high quality photo, are the wow factors. --Cart (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Jewellery

File:Trompetnarcis-trumpet-narcissus 16-03-2025 (d.j.b.).jpg 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 04:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae
Info Flower bud in development of a Trumpet daffodil This green-yellow flower bud will develop into a bright yellow flower. Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, sharp, nice colours, I do think I'd rather see a bit more of the stem though, just for the sake of composition even if there's nothing interesting going on there Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. Note: I also put a picture of the same flower with more stem under this picture at (other versions). So it was a matter of making a choice.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The wider crop of the other picture results in a better composition, but the details shown in this picture are excellent. --Harlock81 (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To me the wider crop is perfect, but it's your image and your choice. Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the responses. I'll leave it like this for now. In this photo I found the distribution of the dew drops a bit better.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae

File:Sur En-Sent. Sculpture Negativ - Positive. Artwork by Peter Gredig. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 04:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info Sur En/Sent, municipality of Scuol, kanton Graubünden. Sculpture Negativ - Positive. Artwork by Peter Gredig. Switzerland is trying to connect art and nature in public outdoor spaces. This sculpture stands with many others along a mountain path near Sur En in the canton of Graubünden.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting artwork Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a QI to me. Quality is fine, the subject is interesting but not extraordinary to overcompensate the simple composition and ordinary lighting/detail level, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 12:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like that the sculpture nicely stands out from the green background, but still fits ‘naturally’ into its surrounding, being made just from wood and stones. The soft light nicely emphasizes the relief on the sculpture. – Aristeas (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors

File:ভরতপক্ষী (Alauda gulgula), লালগঞ্জ, দক্ষিণ চব্বিশ পরগনা, পশ্চিমবঙ্গ, DSC6316.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2025 at 22:10:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
Info created by SVKMBFLY – uploaded by SVKMBFLY – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 22:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 22:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Detail just ok, but the lighting is not good with the whole subject in shadow Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 22:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is not perfect, but somehow it works for me, adding three-dimensionality to the bird and giving a nice mood to the photo. A bonus is that this photo has not been sharpened too much (which is, alas, quite common with wildlife photos), but looks very natural and realistic. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support To me the bird stands out beautifully against the background.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)

File:Gandhi Bhawan, Chandigarh.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2025 at 21:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info A modernist building designed by Pierre Jeanneret, the lesser-known cousin of Le Corbusier. The building sits on a raised plinth in a large P-shaped shallow pool, with an angular and curved three-part pinwheel roof, designed to evoke a floating lotus flower. The white colour of the building was chosen so to contrast with the red of the Fine Arts Museum designed by Corbusier, visible on the right. Picture taken after an intense thunderstorm during late monsoon, when the pool was filled with rainwater. Created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, restful composition. I really dislike this kind of architecture but this manages to make it look quite pleasant. Cmao20 (talk) 21:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is not particularly good and the image quality is not at FP level for me. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 11:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ermell: Thanks for the review. It was taken mid-day, I've adjusted the exposure and light. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the improvements. But I'm also missing the wow effect here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The local brush is really too obvious in the new version, and gives a feeling of over-processing, with an odd white part behind the trees. Interesting mirror image but I would say the lighting conditions and heavy sky were not really so cooperative at the beginning -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment after @Ermell and Basile Morin: reviews I realised the structure looks a bit too warm/yellow for the time it was taken and the light conditions - turns out I had reduced the highlights way too excessively early on while editing the image, causing the unnatural colour. I went back to the original raw image to re-edit it to preserve the while colour of the structure. Pinging also @Cmao20: in case they wish to reconsider their support vote after this significant re-edit. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also adding that the pool is never filled artificially, so this view is only ever possible after heavy rain, which is why I nom'ed it. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification - still fine for me. Cmao20 (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Detail resolution etc. could be better, but I really like the composition – it was a clever move to put the main subject mostly in the left half of the image, this adds tension and interest to the image. The light is not thrilling, yes, but it nicely shows the depth of the building without adding any harsh shadows. And indeed the fact that the pond is filled and provides a nice reflection is a big plus. – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas en Radomianin for the improved version.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India

File:Children playing in the rice mill (edited).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 07:00:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Playing (having fun)
Info Children weave through towering rice-drying cones, transforming a rice mill in Brahmanbaria, Bangladesh, into their playground. This derivative has been edited by me to correct the underexposure of the original and improve the detail. I aimed to preserve the warm light atmosphere by applying tonal corrections, without making the image too cool. Original created and uploaded by Azimronnie – Derivative retouched and uploaded by -- Radomianin (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seeing what a dull gallery this would have been forced into, I realized we are sometimes far too serious here. We had completely forgotten to make room for Homo Ludens! That is now fixed and the gallery is corrected accordingly. Let's make that section grow, I think we all need a bit of that. --Cart (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is an excellent idea, Cart, thank you very much for creating the new gallery section. As the German poet Schiller has put it, people “are only fully human where they play.” – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't agree more with Aristeas - thank you, Cart, for creating this new gallery section. As Homo Ludens, we discover who we are, process experiences, and unfold our personalities through play. It's good to see that spirit given a place within the gallery. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wouldn't be surprised to see this do well at POTY Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo was the deserved winner of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 and I always wanted to nominate it here, but hesitated because of some technical slips. Your edits have made the photo perfect. Thank you very much for your improvements and for the nomination! – Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop is a bit random, but still... --Yann (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support has wow. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Artistic photo with a great composition and an interesting environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 04:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:48, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SupportЮ. Данилевский (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 15:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Playing (having fun)

File:Achacha fruits and seed.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 15:21:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Ivar has done a few good focus stacks of appealing and unusual fruits. This is a small South American fruit with a tart flavour, there are no FPs of it and I think it is depicted attractively. In my opinion the equal of other focus stacks by Ivar I have nominated e.g. here. created by Iifar – uploaded by Iifar – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed and sharp - the usual high Ivar quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I will confess that I hate these "autopsy-room-style" photos where food-related items are dissected, but I know they are good for the encyclopedia so I'll support them. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I get where you’re coming from for sure. I like Ivar’s fruit because they always make me want to learn what this kind of fruit is like, and because the detail is so good. But as you say it’s more illustrative/encyclopedic rather than artistic/imaginative. Cmao20 (talk) 02:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educational and clean background -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see Ivar’s fruit photos as worthy successors of baroque biology illustrations which always combined encyclopedic curiosity with artistic beauty (random example; note the cut fruit and the artificial combination of various stages of development of the insect in one image). Insofar I see no conflict here; for me they are excellent illustrations and excellent photographs. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Fruits (raw)

File:Tadej Pogacar and his team in front of the peloton during Simacourbe climb of Tour de France 2024 stage 13.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 20:06:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Cycling
Info created by Shougissime – uploaded by Shougissime – nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shougissime (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool use of DoF. It's similar to this FP of chess where the DoF is used to single out one piece. Here we get the focus on the guy in the yellow leader shirt. It mirrors the focus a biker needs to have in such a race, and let everything distracting around him fade out, just like the focus in the photo. --Cart (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the only two runners in focus have their bicycles cropped out at the bottom. The level of blur of the foreground is distracting, in my view. And the background cluttered with vehicles make the composition busy -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I think this is a good dynamic shot but I do take Basile's points. The out of focus cyclists in the foreground don't bother me but the cluttered background does Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akeleiblüte (Aquilegia vulgaris)-20220508-RM-112027.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 20:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Ranunculales#Family : Ranunculaceae
Info Columbine flower. Focus stack of 10 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality, beautiful symmetrical composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Always happy to see your focus stacks Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery fixed to the new gallery. This is what I 'pinged' you about earlier when the gallery was created. ;-) --Cart (talk) 21:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support with placement of the stem along the darker part of the background, the flower almost appears to be floating :) --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing smooth background and excellent focus stacking creation -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:44, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent and beautiful, thank you especially for this one as I love Aquilegia flowers. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I appreciate not "fixing" the downward-facing composition -- winds up with an unusual look. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Ranunculales#Family : Ranunculaceae

File:Schenna, Blick von der Verdinserstraße über die Kirche 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 18:31:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely beautiful light and composition! Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a great capture with convincing light and exemplary composition, thank you very much for the nomination. (Only the few remnants of trees on the right edge of the picture could be removed by cropping to refine the composition.) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, followed your advice. --Plozessor (talk) 04:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cart (talk) 21:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Italy

File:Entrance in Torp shopping mall, Uddevalla.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 22:21:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info People using the revolving doors of the entrance to Torp shopping mall, Uddevalla Municipality, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Innovative nomination but heavy contrasts. I also find the cars of the parking and the "Kundvagnar" stand distracting, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The chaos of people going to and from their cars and using shopping carts (kundvagnar) is part of what shopping malls are up here in the north, this is not Singapore. --Cart (talk) 09:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure to understand why "Singapore", but there are too many dark parts, from my point of view, especially the top of the image completely black. Everything here is silhouetted, not just the people. And the image looks over-processed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see anything remarkable which would lead to FP status. 50% of the picture is only black. Yann (talk) 11:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I’m still undecided, but it’s actually a clever feature that most people are just silhouettes without any recognizable features. Otherwise the people in the revolving doors would be very easily recognizable and it would be a severe infringement of their personality rights to publish a photo without their explicit consent (cf. the European GDPR). There are exceptions for press photographs, but Commons is not press photography, and therefore the legal status of the photo would be quite problematic. By hiding their faces in the shadows Cart has completely worked around this problem while still showing the revolving doors in full action. – Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
However you decide (or not) I'm really glad that someone has recognized what I'm trying to do in many of my photos with people. I love street photography and to document everyday life, hopefully in a cool or artistic way. But to comply with the rules on Commons, you need to be creative in how you depict people, especially for FPC. Using silhouettes is a clear favorite for me. I don't see the problem with the percentage of black in the photo, we have other FPs using the same technique, examples. --Cart (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am rather hesitant. But it does fit. I had to look for a long time to see what was so appealing about the photo. At first it looks a bit restless, but the strong contrast is the real strength of the photo. --XRay 💬 18:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per XRay (and my own reasoning). After looking for a while at it I find the composition and the strong contrast quite impressive. The latter also even adds a touch of mystery to the image. – Aristeas (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per XRay en Aristeas. To me, on closer inspection, this is a sophisticated photo where the dark areas are important details.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It took me a while, but yeah, I see why this should be FP now. It's the fact that each of the silhouetted figures is framed within the 'openings' in the revolving doors. It's one of those moments that isn't easy to replicate, takes an artist to see (I don't think most photographers would have taken this shot at all), and it conveys quite a dynamic impression. Each of the figures is doing something a little bit different too - one has her back to us so we can't see, but of the others, one is carrying an ordinary plastic shopping bag, one has what looks like a gift bag, and one is looking at (I think her) phone. It's those little details that make this a piece of photographic art, not just a photo. Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I understand the artistic intent, but it just doesn't work for me. Top third is almost entirely black pixels, the cluttered background breaks any hope for a pleasing symmetry, there are a lot of unintended reflections and glare, and the image is overall not very sharp. Side note, in many countries and Sweden specifically, you don't need consent to take and publish photographs of people in public places. AVDLCZ (talk) 17:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I know about not needing consent here in Sweden, I'm just trying to treat other people in a respectful way. I have some personal experience with how you can be treated if other people think they are entitled to do things, just because it's not against the law. Besides, photos uploaded on Commons are allowed for commercial use, and you do need consent for that in Sweden. --Cart (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann, I see nothing here that makes my heart beat faster Poco a poco (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral While I see the intent and the innovative way to capture people, the picture as a whole doesn't appeal to me. The contast would have worked for me with a less cluttered background, but of course that is out of the photographer's control. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors

File:Firebreathing.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2025 at 11:02:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Holud.himu.kalo.rab – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaim (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the scene is a bit cluttered, the upper and lower crops (perhaps even right) are not satisfactory and I'm also not sure of the angle. That said, I understand that this must not have been easy to photograph. But I'm not convinced for FP here. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Sanderson.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2025 at 10:51:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Shai Franco – uploaded by שעה טובה – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, you can see the music. --Seewolf (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Bottom crop is not good and top crop too tight, but the main issue is the focus. With f/9 I would expect the face not to be so unsharp. Poco a poco (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tight crop at the top doesn't look good. --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Landscape of Sikkim 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2025 at 23:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info created and uploaded by Bernard Gagnon – nominated UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting landscape and good composition although the colours are a bit washed out. But very poor image quality unfortunately, nothing is really sharp and there's not much detail. I wouldn't have passed this as QI personally. Cmao20 (talk) 00:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination You're right about the detail. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arenal (Parapercis tetracantha), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 44.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 13:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Pinguipedidae (Sandperch)
Info Portrait of a reticulated sandperch (Parapercis tetracantha), Anilao, Philippines. This sandprech is found in the Bay of Bengal to seas around Japan and Indonesia throughout the Indo-West Pacific region and can reach a total length of 26.0 centimetres (10.2 in). Note: we have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating eye.--Ermell (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Ermell. – Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Pinguipedidae (Sandperch)

File:Midland Pullman 43 059 and 43 046 Rannoch - Corrour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 14:31:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail_vehicles#United_Kingdom
Info Kabelleger kindly uploaded some beautiful photos of Scottish trains on my request. I like this one because of the dramatic composition and the stark, beautiful, isolated landscape. created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stark indeed, hard to imagine that most of this used to be forests. --Cart (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support the bright blue of the train contrasts beautifully with the uninspiring surrounding landscape. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per UnpetitproleX. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ^(talk) 12:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not eligible to vote yet --A.Savin 08:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per UnpetitproleX. – Aristeas (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Rail_vehicles#United_Kingdom

File:Paro Taktsang, Bhutan (edited).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 21:32:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caption:སྟག་ཚང་།
Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bhutan
Info created by Nina R – originally uploaded by Юрий Д.К. – edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support edited to fix tilt and slightly sharpen from the original. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Your edit removed almost all camera metadata (ISO, f-number, shutter speed etc.), please fix. AVDLCZ (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unsure how to do that, sorry UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here is your version of the photo, but merged with the full EXIF from the original. Use it if you like. (You can just upload it over the version in this nom. EXIF is always displayed from the latest version, the system can't display it from previous versions.) --Cart (talk) 23:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Cart, I’ve uploaded that version. Should be good now. :) UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, solid quality, and the monastery is nicely highlighted by a patch of sunlight against the shady background. Hard to believe that we do not yet have a FP of this famous view, but indeed we have only very few good photo of Paro Taktsang (1, 2 are good QIs but this one is clearly better). – Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 11:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really cool view! Nice light on the monastery, nice clouds in the background Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive location and architecture, good light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /–Aristeas (talk) 05:51, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bhutan

File:A Hundred Steeds.jpg (delist), not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2025 at 09:25:52

Info I came across a new scan File:100 Horses by Giuseppe Castiglione.jpg and would like delist and replace advice. I can see that the new version has better transitions between the newly-obtained compiled scans at thumbnail size, with higher stated resolution and filesize but can't evaluate further on my phone. (Original nomination)
Unsure. As nominator, I will rely on those with proper monitors and eye for detail. I did message Yann, and I will let the uploader know. Sorry if I messed up the nomination, fix at will. -- Commander Keane (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Much better. Yann (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The new one is cropped (look at the mountains in the top left), appears to be oversaturated, and loses quite a lot of the fine detail. MER-C 16:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per MER-C. The pixel-level detail in the proposed replacement is much worse, and the colours are too bright for my taste - the current FP may look dull in thumbnail but all the detail is there Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The new one is badly cropped and oversaturated. MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 delist, 3 keep, 0 neutral → not delisted. /--Cart (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ertholmene aerial view of 3 islands asv2024-07.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2025 at 09:23:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Denmark
Info The Ertholmene archipelago near Bornholm. From left to right: Græsholm, Frederiksø, and Christiansø. All by me --A.Savin 09:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent view of these picturesque islands with their manifold coastline. The settlement and buildings remind me of a lovingly arranged toy train landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 06:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't imagine it is possible to depict these islands any better in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A clear, striking aerial view of Ertholmene with great contrast between the islands and the sea. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice compo and lighting but low res / too much denoising, bent horizon and cw tilt Poco a poco (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose At least solve horizon, and put some Light. --Mile (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Denmark

File:Chestnut-tailed starling (Sturnia malabarica), Bangladesh.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2025 at 16:02:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info created by Mdshahedulislamsadik – uploaded by Mdshahedulislamsadik – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great capture but sadly I can't look past the severe oversharpening Cmao20 (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversharpened. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree, heavily overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 14:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:22, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avutarda kori (Ardeotis kori), zona de conservación de Ngorongoro, Tanzania, 2024-05-27, DD 38.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 20:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Otididae (Small Bustards)
Info Kori bustard (Ardeotis kori), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania. Note: Surprisingly this candidate could be the first FP in the whole order Otidiformes. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution and great quality photo of an interesting bird in the wild Cmao20 (talk) 01:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, while this has good quality and is a strong QI, the light is unexceptional, the background drab and the top-down perspective doesn't work for me. It's valuable image for the species, but I don't think FP. --Cart (talk) 10:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This angle rarely works for photos of animals. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ok, thank you. I thought rare birds would get a plus here. Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marine after Eniwetok assault.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 13:21:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Ray Platnick, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Important photo worth a feature. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 07:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 10:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1940-1949

File:Hermit thrush (10787).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 18:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Turdidae_(Thrushes)
Info Hermit thrush (Catharus guttatus). Happy to finally get some good shots of this regular, but skittish migrant. Wasn't sure whether to nominate this one or File:Hermit thrush (10793).jpg. Same individual -- I like the pose and little flower in that shot, but the background is much cleaner in this one. We'll see what others think. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The feet are unfortunately not quite sharp but otherwise the picture is a FP for me.--Ermell (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 06:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Turdidae_(Thrushes)

File:EU @ G7 Summit 2024 - Family photo (06) (cropped).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 13:03:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Dario Pignatelli – uploaded by Zio27 – nominated by RodRabelo7 -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It should be renamed. Yann (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My instinct is that following the death of an important figure beloved by so many, we should perhaps wait a little bit before we decide what are truly the strongest images we have of him. I think it would be easy to promote this as we wish to commemorate his passing, but also I'm not convinced that the image quality is what I'd want it to be (blur, noise, plus distracting cropped people in the background). Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Je partage l'avis de Cmao20 ,la qualité monstrueusement faible de l'image et la pose très crispée me semble contre productif pour l'illustration d'un hommage posthume décent Mariondelouhans (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree with Cmao20 about the reasoning and Yann re the name, this is a clear equivalent of the Wikipedia:Too soon. And in my very personal opinion, rushing to FPC to score some point with a nom as soon as a famous person has died is also a bit tasteless. We are not in any hurry here. --Cart (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't see any problem with the timing of the nomination -- this just is not among the best photos I've seen of the person. PS: For anyone who hasn't seen it -- as it is now quite timely -- Conclave might be the best movie I've seen this year. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but doesn't blow me away. JayCubby (talk) 19:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moroccan donkey and Populus nigra from Sidi Mimoun river.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 21:10:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice mood and a good representation, but the unfortunate top crop with abruptly cut off tree and ridge, ruins the image for me, sorry. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I agree with some of what UnpetitproleX says. The cut of tree top is unavoidable, but too many other elements could be used better in frame. I keep wanting to move the camera a bit to the right and up, to avoid the partial tree, include a little more of the stream's bank on the right side and clear the ridge of the hill. --Cart (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful bucolic scene, but the light is a bit dull and I have to agree to the remarks on the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 06:59, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Aristeas (talk) 06:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met (73884).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 23:00:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing_and_Textiles
Info The final room of the Camp: Notes on Fashion exhibit at The Met. I took some shots of individual exhibits, but keep coming back to this one, with the top row of colorful looks mirrored in a case (and the top of the big pink hat it contains). Maybe an unusual composition, and I know there are some imperfections (a dark room packed with people), but I like it enough to give it a shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking image with great use of light and color - it captures the essence of the subject very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Cool image, the 'weak' is because the bright reflection bugs me a bit. IMO darkening the lower half somewhat would bring better balance to the photo. --Cart (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive, with a sci-fi movie touch. – Aristeas (talk) 06:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Look better without the reflexion IMHO but this is also FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Clothing_and_Textiles

File:Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2025 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Cypraeidae
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educative, high quality and very appealing color scheme. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radominian. --Seewolf (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radominian. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support An especially pretty one Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Geom (talk) 00:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 06:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Cypraeidae

File:Fall Sunset - Castle Valley, Utah, United States.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2025 at 09:23:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Utah
Info Calm sunset landscape in Utah. Сreated by Andrew Russell – uploaded/nominated by Юрий Д.К 09:23, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К 09:23, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great view and good timing, but the bottom half looks seriously oversaturated, especially the greens like a filter was added to match the great colors of the sunset. I'm leaning towards opposing on those grounds. --Cart (talk) 10:28, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Spectacular, but in my opinion considerably oversatured. It doesn't look natural and the red channel is clipped in places. Cmao20 (talk) 12:34, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see no oversaturation here even a little. I withdraw my nomination and many thanks for both of you. Юрий Д.К 13:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

* Support ZarlokX (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Striked, you can't vote after a nomination has been withdrawn. --Cart (talk) 21:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't seen it. ZarlokX (talk) 21:58, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handhabung, Doppeldecker Häfeli DH-5 (Militär) für Aerofotogrammetrie Aufnahmen, 000398822, edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 15:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Photographers
Info created by Federal Office of Topography, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 17:51, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Work#Photographers

File:Bad Rappenau - Bonfeld - Evangelische Kirche - Kruzifix mit Kerzenbeleuchtung - Detail.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 15:20:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info The baroque crucifix in the protestant church of Bonfeld, Bad Rappenau, Germany, seen in candlelight. All by – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have always admired the courage of those who dare to nominate also ‘strange’ photos which break with some of our rules and habits. Well, it’s Good Friday and so I dare to nominate my favourite crucifix photo, knowing well that there are good reasons to call this a very bad photo. I wanted to photograph this crucifix in pure candlelight because I had the impression that this would make it look much more impressive and alive. But when I tried this (as usual) from a certain distance and with a straight perspective (similar to this photo), the sculpture looked stiff and dead. Only when I took the perspective of a person standing directly in front of the altar and focussed the lens only on the face did the sculpture come to life, so to speak. I know that perspective and crop are completely at odds with our usual conventions here; but somehow the leaning verticals and the narrow framing also seem to fit the motif of the suffering Christ. – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Great, creative way to depict this work of art Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find this image truly moving - precisely because it deliberately breaks with convention. The unusual perspective and warm light convey an intensity and closeness that does justice to the suffering and dignity of Christ in a very special way. As someone who believes, it's this kind of depiction that speaks more deeply than any "technically perfect" image ever could. It feels alive. And it speaks. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light and angle, brings out the intent of the statue rather than just a lifeless object. Well done! --Cart (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rolf Kranz (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good sharpness for a handheld photo, but the harsh shadows and the poor light on the left part of the photo are not successful to me. It is an ordinary sculpture of a common subject present in all churches, basilica and cathedrals (another example). Due to the shallow depth of field, the focus draws the eye to the blood, painted in a not-so-subtle manner. Sorry, I know it's Easter weekend in Western countries, but it is better to leave the calendar aside when judging this kind of images potentially loaded with a strong symbolic connotation. (Hopefully the chocolate eggs will be no less tasty :-)) -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support While I wish for less shadows on the left, the image conveys strong emotions that a different light would not be able to convey. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:40, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors

File:Wrocław - Jahrhunderthalle6.jpg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2025 at 01:24:24

Info Top of the spine digitally modified to fit in the frame. Non-accurate proportions. Compare here or with the previous version in the history of the file page. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info You could mention the author: Taxiarchos228 --Mile (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist because of undeclared digital manipulations at the time of nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Yann (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist At the first glance one could think that only a tiny part of the spine is missing; but comparing several photos (e.g. 1, 2, 3 …) shows that a complete significant part of the spine is missing. If the editing would have been declared properly and if only a tiny part of the spine was missing, one could discuss this; but making us think that the spine is a whole lot smaller and not even declaring this questionable edit is indeed very problematic. Even more because the spine is not an arbitrary element in the photo, but a central part of it. – Aristeas (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. AVDLCZ (talk) 16:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Thi (talk) 07:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist modifications such as these can only be overlooked if duly revealed at the time of nom, and even then this may be too much of a modification to be an accurate depiction of the subject. --UnpetitproleX (Talk)09:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. BigDom (talk) 09:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral → delisted. /Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trains leaving Hůrka station 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 22:49:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro stations
Info Two trains simultaneously leaving the Hůrka metro station in Prague, created and nominated by me. This is my first FP submission, I appreciate any suggestions for improvements (this was shot in RAW, so changes can be made easily). -- AVDLCZ (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AVDLCZ (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support the technical quality looks OK to me, though I'm sure it would be better judged by the other, more experienced (and professional) photographers here. The image definitely has a wow factor for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect.--Ermell (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Successful capture with a Wow. (I took the liberty of adding the missing Short Description). -- Radomianin (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Whooosh! effect. --Cart (talk) 08:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome to FP, looks great to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 06:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. As a user of a similar camera I think it could be even a bit sharper; you might consider manually fine-tuning the focus when you take the next shot; or maybe all what is missing is a little bit more sharpening during raw image development. But it’s totally OK as it is, and congrats for the perfect framing and timing! – Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing this out. I don't shoot that much RAW and didn't notice until today that the camera produces sharper JPEGs than RAWs, which have to be sharpened manually. I've uploaded a new version. AVDLCZ (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the improvement! Yes, the camera automatically sharpens all JPEG images (you can adjust the strength of the sharpening in the camera settings), but it does not sharpen the raw image date. This is correct because raw data often undergo extensive processing (e.g. correcting distortion and perspective, adjusting exposure etc.) and sharpening is best applied only at the end of this processing. Therefore we need to set the sharpening in the raw image processor. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral For me a bit too much floor in relation to the ceiling, otherwise good. --A.Savin 09:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did think about cropping out some of the floor, but ultimately decided against it. The composition feels more vertically balanced this way, and it allows anyone who prefers a cropped version to make one themselves. AVDLCZ (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Time should be biger. --Mile (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rolf Kranz (talk) 12:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Geom (talk) 00:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro stations

File:Faint aurora, a meteorite and some clouds over Tuntorp.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2025 at 13:22:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info (No, not a scene from Wicked...) Despite the less colorful aurora, this is one of my own favorite aurora photos because of its spooky composition, incidentally shot during Halloween season. The aurora was rather faint, making it appear dark green against the black sky in a way that didn’t overwhelm the stars or the little settlement below, the wispy clouds adding to the atmosphere. And of course, the meteorite that made a perfect appearance for a couple of seconds.

The photo is made as a panorama, a trick I learned from another aurora photographer, and I thought I’d share with people here who might like to try similar shots. When you photograph the aurora, your camera is almost always tilted upward which results in leaning buildings and trees. Correcting that, you get those big pesky empty triangles in the lower corners. So you take your main photo and then add one on each side of it to fill in those triangles. That way you get a decent composition too. This is not something you need to think about if you shoot auroras in a landscape that doesn’t require perspective correction. For newbie aurora hunters, I always recommend starting at a beach or on a hill, where you can enjoy the show instead of thinking about the technicalities. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cart (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose Only two active FP nominations per user are allowed. AVDLCZ (talk) 14:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC) ~~{{FPD}}~~[reply]

Comment Sorry AVDLCZ, you are quite new to FPC, so you don't know all the rules yet. This nom was made after the Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gold chain with gemstones and enamel, late 16th century, The Royal Armoury, Sweden.jpg was closed as a 5th day closing (please read the rules), and it's quite legal. ;-) I suggest that you do not make radical edits like this while you are still learning how the FPC works. You might also consider striking you vote since it was made on faulty grounds. --Cart (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I didn't notice the other nomination was just closed. AVDLCZ (talk) 14:39, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, we've all been eager newbies here and learned from our mistakes. :-) --Cart (talk) 15:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Meteorite makes this one special. Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed. Suitable for Halloween. Yann (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support very beautiful and the shooting star is the icing on the cake. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm glad only the owls saw my little silly victory dance after I saw it falling while I had the shutter open. :-) --Cart (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spooky and beautiful - and the shooting star is really the cherry on the top. Wonderfully captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20, UnpetitproleX, Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 06:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:42, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Aurora

File:Obergasse in Alsfeld (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2025 at 20:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hesse
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Compared to other FP, I have the feeling that the technical quality may be deemed insufficient. There's visible noise, especially on the dark wooded structures, and a lack of crisp (sharpness). You may try a highpass sharpening to augment the "crispness". Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Quality is fine for me, I just don't find the composition of the subject that compelling, sorry. --Cart (talk) 11:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition works for me. Nice warm light with stormy clouds, subtle leading lines, beautiful buildings, the grid provides something to look at in the foreground as a counterpoint. Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with the concerns about the sharpness, the compo doesn't work for me, either. There is too much street, the cables don't help either and otherwise I don't think that this shot outlines the beauty of German old town's architecture, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 14:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition a bit unbalanced. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for the composition and perspective. --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fenestrelle - Forte di Fenestrelle - 2024-09-02 16-57-15 001.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2025 at 15:34:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy
Info Another prize winner in Wiki Loves Monuments 2024, this time in Italy. Famous landmark seen as an icon of the city of Turin, here beautifully situated in its context. No FPs of this place. created by Colombo Nicola – uploaded by Colombo Nicola – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Stunning photo and definitely a support from me, but don't you have two active nominations already? AVDLCZ (talk) 18:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of Cmao20's noms reached it's 5th day limit at 15:21, 23 April 2025 with over 10 'supports' and no 'oppose'. This nom was created 13 minutes later. The FPCBot only makes three runs per 24 hours and close the noms having reached the limits at those points. Many of us are simply lazy, and wait for the FPCBot closing before making our new noms, but users who can count for themselves are welcome to make a new nom as soon as one is 'out'. It's good to not rely too much on the FPCBot, since it malfunctions from time to time and we need to do everything manually then. Oh, and something I forgot to mention in my previous lesson: If you "FPD" a nom, you don't 'oppose' it for that. You just quietly put the FPD on the nom and sign. An FPD is not grounds for opposing. --Cart (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. AVDLCZ (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great photo, compo, quality, everything! --Cart (talk) 19:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning! - Benh (talk) 19:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A definite Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support AVDLCZ (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if the photographer is on board, won't completely cropping out the road in the bottom make this a better composition? Currently I find the very bottom portion a bit too distracting. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just a caution, this is a evaluated, price-winning photo and it should not be touched per COM:OVERWRITE. Any alterations must be done on a separate file. Besides that, I don't mind the road at the bottom, it provides context and finishes the compo. --Cart (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, for me the road is too distracting. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and Cart. – Aristeas (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd have cropped the road at the bottom but otherwise very nice Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy

File:Gonyosoma oxycephalum Oslo.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2025 at 16:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Colubridae_(Colubrids)
Info created by Bjørn Christian Tørrissen – uploaded by Bjørn Christian Tørrissen – nominated by BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ -- BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ You should add Category, i hope Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Colubridae_(Colubrids) is correct. --Mile (talk) 10:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Děkuji, ano je to správně BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great green. --Seewolf (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot, good composition + detail. Focus/quality is not the best but it's okay for me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the colors and composition are good, but it's 15 years old photo taken with a bridge camera so there are a lot of chroma noise and artifacts. Unfortunately those are things that aren't easy to fix, so the quality doesn't measure up to a current FP for me. --Cart (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful photo. Technical quality is not the best but still acceptable. AVDLCZ (talk) 21:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marvelous. --Mile (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - I tend to have higher standards for photos of captive animals, and agree with some of cart's criticisms, but the light/colors are just so good I wind up a little on this side of support. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per AVDLCZ and Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Colubridae_(Colubrids)

File:The History of Apple Pie - Kelly Lee Owens (2013).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2025 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
Info created by Sylvain lasco – uploaded by Sylvain lasco – nominated by Seewolf -- Seewolf (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a truly great portrait. --Seewolf (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much Seewolf ! Sylvain lasco (talk) 12:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 21:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Elegant and artistic portrait, but the caption should be better. Cmao20 (talk) 12:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. --Cart (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Cmao20 (talk) 02:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Great catchlight in the eyes, lovely B&W photo. - Fuzheado (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing charm, and as per Fuzheado. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:47, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:32, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If cutting above, i would crop some more, its not scalp of Indian warrior. Otherwise nice portrait in BW. --Mile (talk) 18:44, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:21, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits

File:D-6-74-149-33 Totenkapelle im Landschaftspark Bettenburg (2020).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2025 at 04:33:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 04:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, although the sharpness at the top could be better Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shot is fine but not outstanding to me, sorry. There is room for improvement in terms of sharpness and yes, I like the POV but neither the lighting not the subject are either extraordinary in my eyes. Poco a poco (talk) 14:44, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goldkappl und Sandessee.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2025 at 14:14:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info Looking from the Pflerscher Scharte into a South Tyrolean part of the Stubai Alps. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Huge wow Cmao20 (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning scenery, wonderful sky, excellent quality, good light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Should the panorama template be added or ist this a sensor shift image?--Ermell (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A {{Panorama}} template is helpful, but not mandatory. It's up to the photographer if they want to use it. Some do, some just write the info in the description, and some are fine without it. --Cart (talk) 21:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Info I added the panorama-template. Milseburg (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support majestic! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, I love all those small details you find out when reviewing it at full size Poco a poco (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 18:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:49, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rolf Kranz (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Poco. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:Gleise der Steigerwaldbahn am Gundelsbach zwischen Gochsheim und Grettstadt 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 04:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail_tracks
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 04:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice shot, certain QI, but otherwise I cannot find anything special about it. Sorry --A.Savin 09:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I think I agree with A.Savin here. The central vanishing point is not very interesting, it's all quite a bland composition. I also think the picture doesn't seem to have many shadowed regions, everything is quite bright and I'm not sure this suits the subject. Image quality is of course as high as ever and I like the motif but it doesn't feel like a featured picture to me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nature returns. --Thi (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find the whole abandoned feel of the image eerily calm. Would've been better if the photographer had stepped slightly to the right, but still works for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry. Normally scenes like this one have problems like overexposed highlights, harsh shadows and some noise in the dark areas. We all try to mitigate these problems, but when we go too far a photo can get an unnatural, artificial look, and IMHO this has happened here. There are no (real) shadows in the image, and in areas with slight shadows (e.g. at the trunks of the trees at the left), the image has a painterly look, like some noise reduction tools produce it. Honestly when looking at these details I wondered first whether this is an AI-generated image. As it isn’t, as the Exif data state, I can only assume that the post-processing has caused this look. In any case, the result looks too artificial for my poor old eyes, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 06:44, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like how my pictures look if I lift the shadows too far in Camera RAW, so that the picture has no pure black left. Cmao20 (talk) 00:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20, @Aristeas Thanks for your reviews. What do you think of this alternative version? Plozessor (talk) 05:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the alternative is certainly a big improvement but I'm still not sure the composition is sufficient for FP in my eyes Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you – I agree that the alternative is a big improvement. I would not oppose that version. In the meantime I have taken the liberty to take a look at the XMP data in the original image and the raw conversion settings explain the artificial look. Temperature 5800 is quite warm for a midday scene; Contrast -78, Highlights -100, Shadows +88, Blacks +30, Clarity +100, Vibrance +100 are very daring settings, to put it mildly. The new version reduces some of these values – Contrast +5, Highlights -100, Shadows +64, Blacks +30, Clarity +25, Vibrance +60. Honestly I think that reducing the highlights by more that 50 is almost always problematic (better use additional local reduction, if necessary); Shadows > 50 is rarely needed, but can be useful in rare cases; I almost never raise the blacks (only use negative values like -5 to -20 here if appropriate); I used to use values like Clarity +15, but today apply Clarity only locally, where needed; Vibrance +60 is still very daring and would already be sufficient to say that the result will very probably look quite unreal (typical values are around 10, rarely 20). Do with these remarks what you want; you can ignore them; I just want to give you a hint which settings may cause an artificial look. – Aristeas (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC) @W.carter: I remember your excellent hints on such settings; maybe you could add a short comment on the tasteful use of Clarity and Vibrance? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 14:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Aristeas, I didn't get the 'ping' for some reason. Each toggle in Photoshop has its own specific and good area for their use, but to use them all in extremis like in this photo is too much for me, I wouldn't know where to start with it. I know there are parts of the photo community who like these dreamy photos, where all is beautiful, but to me it's an artificial look. Clarity can be used in big doses on clouds to get some shape in them, to clean up murky waters or define ice crystals or architecture, but for foliage only use very small doses. To go over 22 in Vibrance is never a good idea if you want to avoid psychedelic colors, and if you use a lot of it, you might want to tone down the Saturation. In a way Vibrance and Clarity are each other's opposites, Vibrance adds to bright colors and Clarity makes them grey. In this photo, I think you started with a too bright exposure. The exposure bias is 0. Leaves always reflect light, so the default would be -0.3EV, perhaps go down to -0.7EV with the sun at your back. Once you started to edit to compensate for the brightness, other values became worse and you tried to compensate for them, and it domino-ed into this result. Also keep in mind that Commons system displays photos differently than Photoshop does. What might look ok on your monitor can look weird when uploaded, especially with very processed photos. Hope some of this is helpful. --Cart (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you all for your comments! Sorry for not replying earlier, was busy taking pictures 😉 I appreciate your comments! Plozessor (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /BigDom (talk) 06:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roundabout interchange.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2025 at 09:20:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Structures
Info Roundabout interchange, Belgrade, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree and assume this kind of shot is legal Poco a poco (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Awesomecat713 (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 23:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking clarity and geometry - an impressive capture of clean structure and dynamic form. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment More COM:Categories needed. "Roundabout interchanges somewhere in Serbia" is not enough. --A.Savin 08:10, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @A.Savin could you rewrite again ? "Roundabout interchanges somewhere in Serbia", really ? --Mile (talk) 09:25, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You fix the categories or you not fix the categories? --A.Savin 09:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ERcheck (talk) 22:54, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:59, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Black and White#Structures